MENU
Wireless access control attacks aim to penetrate a network by evading WLAN access control measures, such as AP MAC filters and Wi-Fi port access controls.
Which of the following wireless access control attacks allows the attacker to set up a rogue access point outside the corporate perimeter, and then lure the employees of the organization to connect to it?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CFA-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
50 comments · newest first
DE
Derrick
11 months ago
B is the right answer, no doubt about it!
ME
Melodie
11 months ago
Wait, people actually fall for that? Sounds risky!
AR
Arlean
11 months ago
War driving is just about mapping, not setting up a rogue AP.
SH
Shayne
12 months ago
I think it's actually D, client mis-association is sneaky.
RO
Rory
12 months ago
Definitely B, rogue access points are a big issue!
AL
Altha
12 months ago
I feel like MAC spoofing is more about disguising devices, not really about luring employees to connect.
HE
Hermila
1 year ago
War driving seems more about finding networks rather than setting up a rogue AP, so I don't think that's it.
WI
Willis
1 year ago
I think client mis-association might be the answer, but it sounds similar to rogue access points.
TO
Toshia
1 year ago
I remember studying rogue access points, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right answer here.
BR
Brittni
1 year ago
Based on the description, it sounds like the attacker is trying to bypass the organization's access controls by tricking employees into connecting to a malicious access point. I'm leaning towards B, Rogue access points, as the most likely answer.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Can someone explain the differences between these attack types in more detail? I want to make sure I understand before answering.
AD
Adela
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is that the attacker needs to set up a rogue access point outside the corporate perimeter and lure employees to connect to it. I think the answer is B, Rogue access points.
RO
Rodney
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about the differences between these wireless access control attacks. I'll need to think this through carefully.
JO
Jonell
1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident I can figure this one out.
CA
Carin
1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the right approach here. Let me double-check my understanding.
CH
Cherelle
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the total rewards strategy is the answer here. That's where a company would define the appropriate labor market segments and desired competitive position for each employee group as part of their overall compensation and benefits approach.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes how truffle boxes can be used.
IS
Isabelle
1 year ago
I'm not too familiar with Gherkin, but this seems like a good opportunity to practice. I'll make sure to read the question thoroughly and think through the different scenarios.
IS
Isaiah
1 year ago
Rogue access points, definitely. Gotta love how the attacker can just set up shop outside the corporate walls and wait for the unsuspecting employees to come to them. It's like fishing with dynamite!
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
D) Client mis-association
WI
Wilson
1 year ago
C) MAC spoofing
IS
Isadora
1 year ago
B) Rogue access points
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
C) MAC spoofing
FA
Fausto
1 year ago
B) Rogue access points
MA
Matthew
1 year ago
A) War driving
KR
Krystal
1 year ago
A) War driving
MA
Maddie
1 year ago
War driving? I thought that was just driving around looking for open wireless networks. This question is really testing our wireless security knowledge.
RA
Raylene
1 year ago
C) MAC spoofing
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
B) Rogue access points
KE
Keva
1 year ago
A) War driving
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
Client mis-association? Sounds like something straight out of a spy movie. I bet the attacker just lures the employees in with free WiFi and then BOOM, they're in the network!
JE
Jenelle
1 year ago
It's like a modern-day espionage tactic, but with WiFi instead of secret codes.
SH
Shawnee
1 year ago
Definitely! Attackers can easily trick employees into connecting to their rogue access point.
LO
Lorenza
1 year ago
That's right! Client mis-association is a sneaky attack method.
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
D) Client mis-association
MY
My
1 year ago
C) MAC spoofing
MA
Markus
1 year ago
B) Rogue access points
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
A) War driving
CH
Chauncey
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if it's rogue access points. Doesn't MAC spoofing also let you impersonate an authorized AP? I need to review that one.
KA
Kathrine
2 years ago
Rogue access points! That's the one that lets the attacker set up a fake AP outside the company and trick employees into connecting to it. Sneaky!
DA
Dawne
1 year ago
MAC spoofing can also be used to bypass access controls by impersonating a legitimate device.
CO
Colette
1 year ago
War driving is also a common attack where hackers drive around looking for vulnerable networks.
ST
Stevie
1 year ago
That's right. It's important to be cautious and not connect to unknown Wi-Fi networks.
HY
Hyun
1 year ago
Yes, rogue access points are dangerous. They can easily trick people into connecting to them.
ZA
Zachary
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be A) War driving.
TH
Thora
2 years ago
I agree with Ronald, rogue access points can trick employees into connecting to them.
RO
Ronald
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Rogue access points.
SH
Shasta
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) MAC spoofing could also be a possible answer.
OL
Ollie
2 years ago
I agree with Bette, rogue access points can trick employees into connecting to them.
BE
Bette
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Rogue access points.