Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM CFA-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

According to US federal rules, to present a testimony in a court of law, an expert witness needs to furnish certain information to prove his eligibility. Jason, a qualified computer forensic expert who has started practicing two years back, was denied an expert testimony in a computer crime case by the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia. Considering the US federal rules, what could be the most appropriate reason for the court to reject Jason's eligibility as an expert witness?
A) Jason was unable to furnish documents showing four years of previous experience in the field
B) Being a computer forensic expert, Jason is not eligible to present testimony in a computer crime case
C) Jason was unable to furnish documents to prove that he is a computer forensic expert
D) Jason was not aware of legal issues involved with computer crimes

GAQM CFA-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CFA-001 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All CFA-001 Questions]

According to US federal rules, to present a testimony in a court of law, an expert witness needs to furnish certain information to prove his eligibility. Jason, a qualified computer forensic expert who has started practicing two years back, was denied an expert testimony in a computer crime case by the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia. Considering the US federal rules, what could be the most appropriate reason for the court to reject Jason's eligibility as an expert witness?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ernie at May 09, 2022, 10:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFA-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Merilyn
10 months ago
No way he wasn't aware of legal issues, that's basic stuff!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
10 months ago
I thought being qualified was enough, this is surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
10 months ago
Wait, how can he be denied just for experience?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
11 months ago
Totally agree, four years is a standard requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
He probably didn't have enough experience yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
11 months ago
I vaguely recall discussions about how knowledge of legal issues is crucial for expert witnesses. Could option D be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
11 months ago
I think I read that experts need to prove their qualifications, so option C could be a possibility if he didn’t provide the right documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
11 months ago
I’m not sure, but I thought being a computer forensic expert should qualify him for testifying in a computer crime case. So, option B seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
11 months ago
I remember something about the requirement for expert witnesses to have a certain amount of experience, so maybe option A is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
11 months ago
Ah, this is definitely an open-ended question. I can give a thorough overview of my role and duties in the lab.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
11 months ago
Wait, I thought it was the other way around - create with -o shared and mount with -o cluster. This is tripping me up a bit, I need to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the key features of blockchain to determine which of these options would be best suited for that technology.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel