GAQM CCCP-001 Exam - Topic 8 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CCCP-001 exam

Question #: 91
Topic #: 8

Which of the following access control types allows users to assign security attributes to objects such as files and directories?

ARole based

BMandatory

CDiscretionary

DRule set based

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jade at Sep 12, 2024, 09:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCCP-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Wayne

5 months ago

Discretionary makes sense, but I’m surprised it’s not more complicated!

upvoted 0 times

...

Isreal

6 months ago

Wait, are we sure it's not Rule set based?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chery

6 months ago

Mandatory access control is more restrictive, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

6 months ago

I thought it was Role based, but I guess not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

6 months ago

It's definitely Discretionary access control!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

7 months ago

I'm leaning towards Discretionary too, but I keep mixing it up with Rule set based. I wish I could remember the differences better!

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

7 months ago

I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and I think it was about Role-based access control. But that doesn't sound right for this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

7 months ago

I remember studying that Mandatory access control is more about system-enforced policies, so it can't be the answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tuyet

7 months ago

I think the answer might be Discretionary, but I'm not completely sure. It seems like users can control access in that model.

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

7 months ago

I'm confident the answer is C. Discretionary access control is the model that allows users to directly manage the security attributes of the objects they own.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

7 months ago

Discretionary access control sounds right to me. That's the one where users have the ability to set permissions on their own files and folders.

upvoted 0 times

...

Okay, let me see. I know mandatory access control is based on system-defined security levels, and role-based is for assigning permissions by job function. I think the answer here is discretionary access control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gregoria

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different access control models to determine the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

7 months ago

I'm pretty sure this is asking about discretionary access control, where users can assign permissions to their own files and directories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edelmira

7 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question about the required settings for defining an index in indexes.conf. I'll carefully review each option and select the ones that apply.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

12 months ago

Discretionary access control, huh? Sounds like the kind of thing that would let me assign 'Administrator' privileges to my cat's folder. Not that I'd Cyrilr do that... or would I?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

12 months ago

I heard Discretionary access control is the answer, but I have to admit, the name makes it sound a bit too 'discretionary' for my liking. Shouldn't security be a bit more... mandatory?

upvoted 0 times

Misty

10 months ago

Rule set based access control might provide a good balance between flexibility and security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glen

10 months ago

Mandatory access control could be a good option for strict security requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Destiny

11 months ago

I prefer Role based access control, it seems more structured and organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammi

11 months ago

I think you're right, Discretionary access control does sound a bit too flexible for my taste.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

12 months ago

Discretionary access control, hands down. It's the one that gives users the ability to customize the security settings for their own files and directories.

upvoted 0 times

...