Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM CCCP-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 9 Discussion

A network administrator was tasked with creating several new subnets which will support 30 virtual hosts per subnet. Which of the following VLANs below would be used to support those hosts?VLAN 100 192.168.1.0/30VLAN 200 192.168.1.0/29VLAN 300 192.168.1.0/26VLAN 400 192.168.1.30/32
C) 300
A) 100
B) 200
D) 400

GAQM CCCP-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CCCP-001 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 4
[All CCCP-001 Questions]

A network administrator was tasked with creating several new subnets which will support 30 virtual hosts per subnet. Which of the following VLANs below would be used to support those hosts?

VLAN 100 192.168.1.0/30

VLAN 200 192.168.1.0/29

VLAN 300 192.168.1.0/26

VLAN 400 192.168.1.30/32

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lavonda
10 months ago
I thought /26 was for 64 hosts, is that right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
10 months ago
VLAN 200 is too small for 30 hosts, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
10 months ago
Wait, why would you use /30 or /32 for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
Totally agree, that's the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
11 months ago
VLAN 300 192.168.1.0/26 can support 62 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
11 months ago
I feel like /26 is the best option here, but I just hope I’m not mixing up the subnet masks again!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe /29 gives us 6 usable addresses, so that's not enough either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think /30 only gives us 2 usable addresses, which definitely won't work for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
11 months ago
I remember we need at least 32 IP addresses for 30 hosts, so I think /26 might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards C. Built-in Functions that can be translated to SQL seem like they should be fair game for calculated attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
11 months ago
Linking requirements, test cases, and test logs is key for traceability and verifying test coverage. I think option A is the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
11 months ago
I want to say it's mostly funded by employers. Wasn't there a discussion about employee contributions being optional in some cases?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel