MENU
In a particular organization it is common practice to call all managers by their first name. It is part of the culture of the organization. Newcomers are quickly corrected if they do not follow this informal approach. What would knowing about this convention be classified as in Requirements Engineering?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
AN
Anthony
11 months ago
Sounds like a weird way to enforce culture.
CH
Christiane
11 months ago
Newcomers get corrected? That's interesting!
LE
Leontine
11 months ago
Wait, is it really tacit? Seems like it could be explicit too.
SA
Sang
12 months ago
I agree, it's not something you can just write down.
LA
Latanya
12 months ago
That's definitely tacit corporate knowledge.
FR
Franchesca
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards tacit corporate knowledge, but I could see how it might be classified differently. This is tricky!
BE
Bette
1 year ago
I feel like it could be tacit individual knowledge too, but since it's a cultural norm for the whole organization, maybe it's more about the corporate aspect?
JE
Jeanice
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that mentioned explicit knowledge being documented. This seems more informal.
AL
Alyce
1 year ago
I think this might be tacit corporate knowledge since it's something that newcomers learn through experience rather than formal training.
BR
Brock
1 year ago
Based on the details provided, I think the best answer here is that this would be classified as tacit corporate knowledge. The fact that it's an established cultural norm within the organization, even if it's not formally documented, points to it being a shared, implicit understanding rather than explicit individual or corporate knowledge.
JO
Jolene
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Is the fact that it's a common practice in the organization relevant, or is it just about the nature of the knowledge itself? I'm not sure if I'm overthinking this or if there's some nuance I'm missing.
FA
Fabiola
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The fact that newcomers are quickly corrected if they don't follow the informal name usage suggests that this is a well-established, shared understanding within the organization. So I'd say this is an example of tacit corporate knowledge.
BL
Blondell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The question is asking about a specific organizational convention, so I'm wondering if that changes how I should classify the knowledge. I'll have to think this through carefully.
AL
Alonso
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about requirements engineering concepts. I'm pretty confident I know the difference between explicit and tacit knowledge, so I'll give this a try.
LE
Lennie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know it has something to do with financing, but I'm not totally clear on the concept of matching maturities. I'll have to think this through carefully.
DO
Domonique
1 year ago
Ha! I bet the new hires who get 'corrected' for not using first names feel like they're in the principal's office. Gotta love that corporate culture.
DE
Dexter
1 year ago
C) Explicit corporate knowledge.
JA
Jacki
1 year ago
B) Tacit individual knowledge.
MA
Mayra
1 year ago
A) Explicit individual knowledge.
MA
Marla
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards tacit individual knowledge since it's more about personal interactions and social norms rather than official policies.
EL
Elli
1 year ago
C) Explicit corporate knowledge.
AL
Alesia
1 year ago
B) Tacit individual knowledge.
DO
Dorsey
1 year ago
A) Explicit individual knowledge.
BR
Brandon
1 year ago
I'd say explicit corporate knowledge. Even though it's not written down, it's a well-known convention that new hires are quickly made aware of.
MA
Marisha
2 years ago
Definitely tacit corporate knowledge. This informal way of addressing managers is deeply embedded in the company's culture, not something that's formally documented.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
D) Tacit corporate knowledge.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
C) Explicit corporate knowledge.
AL
Alise
1 year ago
B) Tacit individual knowledge.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
A) Explicit individual knowledge.
CA
Carlee
2 years ago
But wouldn't it also be considered Explicit corporate knowledge since it's a known practice within the organization?
CH
Chauncey
2 years ago
I agree with Clare, because it's something you learn through experience in the organization.
CL
Clare
2 years ago
I think it would be classified as Tacit individual knowledge.