GAQM CBAF-001 Exam - Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam

Question #: 53
Topic #: 6

In a particular organization it is common practice to call all managers by their first name. It is part of the culture of the organization. Newcomers are quickly corrected if they do not follow this informal approach. What would knowing about this convention be classified as in Requirements Engineering?

AExplicit individual knowledge.

BTacit individual knowledge.

CExplicit corporate knowledge.

DTacit corporate knowledge.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Leah at Aug 06, 2024, 08:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Anthony

7 months ago

Sounds like a weird way to enforce culture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

8 months ago

Newcomers get corrected? That's interesting!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

8 months ago

Wait, is it really tacit? Seems like it could be explicit too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

8 months ago

I agree, it's not something you can just write down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latanya

8 months ago

That's definitely tacit corporate knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franchesca

9 months ago

I’m leaning towards tacit corporate knowledge, but I could see how it might be classified differently. This is tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

9 months ago

I feel like it could be tacit individual knowledge too, but since it's a cultural norm for the whole organization, maybe it's more about the corporate aspect?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeanice

9 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that mentioned explicit knowledge being documented. This seems more informal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

9 months ago

I think this might be tacit corporate knowledge since it's something that newcomers learn through experience rather than formal training.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

9 months ago

Based on the details provided, I think the best answer here is that this would be classified as tacit corporate knowledge. The fact that it's an established cultural norm within the organization, even if it's not formally documented, points to it being a shared, implicit understanding rather than explicit individual or corporate knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolene

9 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. Is the fact that it's a common practice in the organization relevant, or is it just about the nature of the knowledge itself? I'm not sure if I'm overthinking this or if there's some nuance I'm missing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

9 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The fact that newcomers are quickly corrected if they don't follow the informal name usage suggests that this is a well-established, shared understanding within the organization. So I'd say this is an example of tacit corporate knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. The question is asking about a specific organizational convention, so I'm wondering if that changes how I should classify the knowledge. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonso

9 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about requirements engineering concepts. I'm pretty confident I know the difference between explicit and tacit knowledge, so I'll give this a try.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lennie

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know it has something to do with financing, but I'm not totally clear on the concept of matching maturities. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domonique

1 year ago

Ha! I bet the new hires who get 'corrected' for not using first names feel like they're in the principal's office. Gotta love that corporate culture.

upvoted 0 times

Dexter

1 year ago

C) Explicit corporate knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacki

1 year ago

B) Tacit individual knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mayra

1 year ago

A) Explicit individual knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marla

1 year ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards tacit individual knowledge since it's more about personal interactions and social norms rather than official policies.

upvoted 0 times

Elli

1 year ago

C) Explicit corporate knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alesia

1 year ago

B) Tacit individual knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

1 year ago

A) Explicit individual knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

1 year ago

I'd say explicit corporate knowledge. Even though it's not written down, it's a well-known convention that new hires are quickly made aware of.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marisha

1 year ago

Definitely tacit corporate knowledge. This informal way of addressing managers is deeply embedded in the company's culture, not something that's formally documented.

upvoted 0 times