GAQM CBAF-001 Exam - Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 2

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?

ABy a broken, arrowed line stereotypedwith the word include.

BBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.

CBy a solid line with no arrowhead or stereotype.

DBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lai at Mar 08, 2024, 11:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Clemencia

3 months ago

Really? I thought optional processing was always included, this is confusing!

upvoted 0 times

...

King

3 months ago

Solid line with no arrowhead? That's not right, C is wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nell

3 months ago

Wait, isn't it B? I thought uses was the right term.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusita

4 months ago

I think it's actually A, includes are for optional stuff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derrick

4 months ago

Definitely option D, that's how extends work!

upvoted 0 times

...

Izetta

4 months ago

I thought "uses" was a term we learned, but it seems like it’s not the right stereotype for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to differentiate between "include" and "extend." I feel like this one is definitely "include."

upvoted 0 times

...

Beula

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about "extend" being used for optional behavior. Maybe that's the right choice?

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

5 months ago

I think the original use case should be linked with an "include" relationship since it's calling the optional processing when needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamaria

5 months ago

Okay, let me see if I can work this out. If the optional processing is being moved to a separate use case, then the original use case should be linked to the new one using an "include" relationship, right? That makes the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernice

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know there are different types of relationships between use cases, but I can't quite recall the specifics. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about use case relationships. I think the key is to remember the difference between "include" and "extend" relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dierdre

5 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. The question is asking how the original use case should be linked to the new one, and based on the details provided, I think the answer is option A - a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word "include".

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Fishbone Diagram is used for root cause analysis, but I'm not totally clear on how the different categories, like "Equipment," are supposed to be used. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident the answer is `ifconfig --a --d bridges`. That should list all the network bridges on the system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florencia

5 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about WSUS in our security module. That's the right tool for centralized Microsoft update distribution. I'm confident that's the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Angelyn

10 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I thought the extend stereotype was only for extending the functionality of a use case, not for removing optional processing. I'm going to have to think about this one.

upvoted 0 times

Rosalind

8 months ago

D) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

8 months ago

B) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

8 months ago

A) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hester

10 months ago

Haha, this is a tricky one! I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up. I'm going with option D, just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

Alaine

9 months ago

I agree with you, option D seems like the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

9 months ago

I'm going with option C, it seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zona

10 months ago

I think option A is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the include stereotype make more sense since the original use case is including the optional processing in the new use case?

upvoted 0 times