Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM Exam CBAF-001 Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 2
[All CBAF-001 Questions]

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lai at Mar 08, 2024, 11:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Angelyn
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I thought the extend stereotype was only for extending the functionality of a use case, not for removing optional processing. I'm going to have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
23 days ago
D) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
24 days ago
B) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 months ago
A) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hester
3 months ago
Haha, this is a tricky one! I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up. I'm going with option D, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
1 months ago
I agree with you, option D seems like the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 months ago
I'm going with option C, it seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the include stereotype make more sense since the original use case is including the optional processing in the new use case?
upvoted 0 times
Luis
1 months ago
D) That makes sense, the include stereotype is the correct way to link the original use case to the new use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 months ago
C) I agree, the include stereotype shows that the original use case is including the optional processing in the new use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 months ago
Hmm, I think you're right. The include stereotype does make more sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
A) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
2 months ago
B) I think you're right, the include stereotype does make more sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
3 months ago
A) By a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
3 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. The extend stereotype is used to link a base use case to an optional extension use case.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B might be the correct way to link them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
2 months ago
I believe option A is the right choice, with the include stereotype.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
2 months ago
I think it should be linked with a solid line, so I choose option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
3 months ago
I agree, option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawn
3 months ago
But wouldn't using 'include' make more sense since the optional processing is being separated out?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it should be linked by a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
4 months ago
I think the original use case should be linked to the new use case by a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel