GAQM Exam CBAF-001 Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 2

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?

ABy a broken, arrowed line stereotypedwith the word include.

BBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.

CBy a solid line with no arrowhead or stereotype.

DBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lai at Mar 08, 2024, 11:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Katie

20 hours ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the include stereotype make more sense since the original use case is including the optional processing in the new use case?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlota

9 days ago

I think option D is the correct answer. The extend stereotype is used to link a base use case to an optional extension use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

13 days ago

But wouldn't using 'include' make more sense since the optional processing is being separated out?

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

14 days ago

I disagree, I believe it should be linked by a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

15 days ago

I think the original use case should be linked to the new use case by a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.

upvoted 0 times

...