Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM APM-001 Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's APM-001 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All APM-001 Questions]

A risk response strategy in which the project team shifts the impact of a threat, together with ownership of the response, to a third party is called:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Noemi at Sep 17, 2024, 08:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium APM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kenneth
5 months ago
I thought it was mitigate... not so sure now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
6 months ago
Definitely transfer, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
6 months ago
Wait, isn't that just outsourcing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
6 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about shifting the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
6 months ago
It's called transfer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
7 months ago
I feel like "avoid" is definitely not the right choice here. I think I need to go with "transfer," but I hope I’m remembering it correctly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
7 months ago
I'm torn between "accept" and "transfer." I know "transfer" involves shifting the risk, but "accept" seems like it could apply too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about risk strategies, and "mitigate" was definitely one of the options. But I feel like "transfer" fits better here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
7 months ago
I think the answer might be "transfer," but I'm not completely sure. It sounds familiar from the risk management chapter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
7 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about these risk response strategies in class. Transfer is the one where you shift the risk to someone else, so that's got to be the right answer here. Feeling confident about this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
7 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. The question is asking about a strategy where the project team shifts the impact and ownership to a third party. That sounds like transfer to me, so I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know there are different risk response strategies, but I'm not totally clear on the differences between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
7 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - transfer, since that's the risk response strategy where you shift the impact and ownership to a third party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
7 months ago
Practicable requirements for the tester, and consistent requirements for all participants - those seem like the two most relevant options to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
B) accept? Really? What kind of project manager just accepts a risk? That's like waving the white flag and saying, 'Bring it on, universe!' Not for me, thanks. I'll take C) transfer any day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question: do I want to face the risk head-on or hide behind a third party? C) transfer is the way to go, my friends. That's how the big shots do it, so it must be the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
Rolf
11 months ago
That's a good point, we should always have a backup plan in case the transfer doesn't work out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
11 months ago
But what if the third party fails to handle the risk effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
11 months ago
I agree, transferring the risk to a third party seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissia
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) avoid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A) mitigate and C) transfer. On one hand, trying to minimize the risk sounds smart, but on the other hand, shifting the problem to someone else is just so much easier. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Vivienne
11 months ago
True, but transferring the risk can also save us time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
11 months ago
But what about mitigating the risk ourselves? It might be more proactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
12 months ago
I agree, transferring the risk to a third party can be a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
12 months ago
I think C) transfer is the way to go. Let someone else deal with the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
12 months ago
Yeah, it can definitely make things easier for the project team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
I think transferring the risk to a third party is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
1 year ago
I agree with Dulce, transferring the risk to a third party is a good strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
C) transfer seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, why deal with the risk yourself when you can just pass it on to someone else, right? Talk about a win-win situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) avoid. Avoiding the risk altogether seems like a valid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
1 year ago
I agree with Truman, transferring the risk to a third party is a common strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel