MENU
A risk response strategy in which the project team shifts the impact of a threat, together with ownership of the response, to a third party is called:
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium APM-001 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
KE
Kenneth
11 months ago
I thought it was mitigate... not so sure now.
VI
Viva
11 months ago
Definitely transfer, no doubt about it!
TA
Talia
11 months ago
Wait, isn't that just outsourcing?
TE
Terrilyn
12 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about shifting the risk.
CH
Cherilyn
12 months ago
It's called transfer!
YO
Yolando
12 months ago
I feel like "avoid" is definitely not the right choice here. I think I need to go with "transfer," but I hope I’m remembering it correctly!
SH
Sherly
1 year ago
I'm torn between "accept" and "transfer." I know "transfer" involves shifting the risk, but "accept" seems like it could apply too.
AM
Amos
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about risk strategies, and "mitigate" was definitely one of the options. But I feel like "transfer" fits better here.
DO
Domonique
1 year ago
I think the answer might be "transfer," but I'm not completely sure. It sounds familiar from the risk management chapter.
ES
Esteban
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about these risk response strategies in class. Transfer is the one where you shift the risk to someone else, so that's got to be the right answer here. Feeling confident about this one!
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. The question is asking about a strategy where the project team shifts the impact and ownership to a third party. That sounds like transfer to me, so I'll go with C.
GA
Garry
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know there are different risk response strategies, but I'm not totally clear on the differences between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
VA
Van
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - transfer, since that's the risk response strategy where you shift the impact and ownership to a third party.
LE
Leonor
1 year ago
Practicable requirements for the tester, and consistent requirements for all participants - those seem like the two most relevant options to me.
EV
Evangelina
1 year ago
B) accept? Really? What kind of project manager just accepts a risk? That's like waving the white flag and saying, 'Bring it on, universe!' Not for me, thanks. I'll take C) transfer any day.
NE
Nelida
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old question: do I want to face the risk head-on or hide behind a third party? C) transfer is the way to go, my friends. That's how the big shots do it, so it must be the right answer!
RO
Rolf
1 year ago
That's a good point, we should always have a backup plan in case the transfer doesn't work out.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
But what if the third party fails to handle the risk effectively?
AN
An
1 year ago
I agree, transferring the risk to a third party seems like the safest option.
ME
Melissia
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) avoid.
MA
Markus
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A) mitigate and C) transfer. On one hand, trying to minimize the risk sounds smart, but on the other hand, shifting the problem to someone else is just so much easier. Decisions, decisions...
VI
Vivienne
1 year ago
True, but transferring the risk can also save us time and resources.
EA
Earlean
1 year ago
But what about mitigating the risk ourselves? It might be more proactive.
KI
Kimberlie
1 year ago
I agree, transferring the risk to a third party can be a smart move.
RA
Ramonita
1 year ago
I think C) transfer is the way to go. Let someone else deal with the risk.
VI
Vicente
1 year ago
Yeah, it can definitely make things easier for the project team.
IS
Isadora
1 year ago
I think transferring the risk to a third party is a good idea.
AS
Ashton
2 years ago
I agree with Dulce, transferring the risk to a third party is a good strategy.
DU
Dulce
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) transfer.
CH
Cherelle
2 years ago
C) transfer seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, why deal with the risk yourself when you can just pass it on to someone else, right? Talk about a win-win situation!
YU
Yun
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) avoid. Avoiding the risk altogether seems like a valid option too.
SH
Sherman
2 years ago
I agree with Truman, transferring the risk to a third party is a common strategy.
TR
Truman
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) transfer.