Refer to the exhibit.

You configure SD-WAN on a standalone FortiGate device. You want to create an SD-WAN rule that steers Facebook and Linkedin traffic through the less costly internet link. The FortiGate GUI page appears as shown in the exhibit.
What should you do to set Facebook and LinkedIn as destinations?
In an SD-WAN rule, you can steer application traffic by using Internet Service Database (ISDB) entries. Facebook and LinkedIn are predefined ISDB objects in FortiGate, so the correct way is to select them in the Internet service field under Destination. This ensures that all traffic to these applications is matched and routed through the chosen (less costly) link.
(You configure the overlay tunnels for an SD-WAN hub-and-spoke topology defined with IPsec tunnels, BGP on loopback, and dynamic BGP.
Which are two recommended IPsec settings for this topology? Choose two answers.)
Refer to the exhibit, which shows the SD-WAN rule status and configuration.

Based on the exhibit, which change in the measured latency will first make HUB1-VPN3 the new preferred member?
The rule is in priority mode with HUB1-VPN1 (seq 4) as the first preferred member, HUB1-VPN2 second, and HUB1-VPN3 third. Latency itself does not cause HUB1-VPN3 to become preferred unless a higher-priority member fails SLA. If HUB1-VPN1's latency exceeds the SLA threshold (here simulated by latency reaching 200 ms), FortiGate stops using it and moves down the priority list. That is when HUB1-VPN3 could become the active path.
(You want to configure two static routes: one that references an SD-WAN zone and a second one that references an SD-WAN member that belongs to that zone.
Which statement about this scenario is true? Choose one answer.)
In FortiOS 7.6, static routes can reference either:
an SD-WAN zone (for example, virtual-wan-link or a user-defined SD-WAN zone), or
a specific SD-WAN member interface that belongs to that zone.
However, FortiOS enforces a routing constraint to avoid ambiguity during route resolution. Two static routes cannot have the same destination prefix if one points to an SD-WAN zone and the other points to an SD-WAN member within that zone. This would create an overlapping and conflicting forwarding decision.
Therefore, if you configure:
one static route that references an SD-WAN zone, and
another static route that references an SD-WAN member belonging to that same zone,
the destination subnets of the two static routes must be different.
Why the other options are incorrect:
Option A is incorrect because FortiOS does allow static routes that reference individual SD-WAN members.
Option B is incorrect because static routes can reference SD-WAN zones.
Option D is incorrect because static routing decisions in FortiOS are based on destination prefixes, not source prefixes.
Thus, the correct answer is C.
Refer to the exhibit. You noticed that one SD-WAN member went down and you immediately collected the session output shown in the exhibit. What can you conclude from this output? Choose one answer.)

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!