Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 7 Question 61 Discussion

A retail customer with a FortiADC HA cluster load balancing five webservers in L7 Full NAT mode is receiving reports of users not able to access their website during a sale event. But for clients that were able to connect, the website works fine.CPU usage on the FortiADC and the web servers is low, application and database servers are still able to handle more traffic, and the bandwidth utilization is under 30%.Which two options can resolve this situation? (Choose two.)
A) Change the persistence rule to LB_PERSIS_SSL_SESSJD. and D) Add a connection-pool to the FortiADC virtual server
B) Add more web servers to the real server poof
C) Disable SSL between the FortiADC and the web servers

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 7 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 7
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

A retail customer with a FortiADC HA cluster load balancing five webservers in L7 Full NAT mode is receiving reports of users not able to access their website during a sale event. But for clients that were able to connect, the website works fine.

CPU usage on the FortiADC and the web servers is low, application and database servers are still able to handle more traffic, and the bandwidth utilization is under 30%.

Which two options can resolve this situation? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Christene at May 11, 2026, 11:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kaitlyn
17 hours ago
I feel like disabling SSL (option C) could create security issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
6 days ago
Yeah, but adding more servers (option B) might also be a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
11 days ago
I think option A could help with the SSL session persistence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
16 days ago
Option D with the connection-pool sounds like a solid fix to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
21 days ago
Disabling SSL (option C) could create security risks, not a good idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
27 days ago
Isn't it surprising that CPU and bandwidth are fine but users still can't connect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
1 month ago
I disagree, adding more servers (option B) might just complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
1 month ago
Sounds like a persistence issue, maybe try option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
1 month ago
Definitely try the connection-pool option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
2 months ago
Low CPU and bandwidth but still issues? Weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
2 months ago
Disabling SSL? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
2 months ago
I think adding more web servers could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 months ago
Sounds like a persistence issue to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
2 months ago
Adding more web servers sounds like a good idea, but if the current servers are underutilized, it might not solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
2 months ago
I think disabling SSL might create security issues, but it could also reduce overhead. Not sure if that's the best option though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
3 months ago
This situation reminds me of a practice question where we had to optimize load balancing. Adding a connection-pool could help, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
4 months ago
I remember studying persistence rules, but I'm not sure if changing to LB_PERSIS_SSL_SESSJD is the right move here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel