New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 7 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 7
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

Which two statements about bounce address tagging and verification (BATV) on FortiMail are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Salena at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dino
3 days ago
A and C make the most sense to me. Solid choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
8 days ago
B is just plain wrong. Who sends emails with an empty sender address?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
13 days ago
D is the way to go. Symmetric keys are the way of the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
18 days ago
A and C are correct. Gotta love that BATV!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
23 days ago
I recall BATV using asymmetric keys, so I'm hesitant about D being true; it seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
28 days ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think C is correct since FortiMail usually modifies the sender address for tagging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 month ago
I'm not so sure about B; I feel like emails with empty sender addresses might not even be processed for bounce verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
1 month ago
I think option A is definitely true because I remember reading about needing to publish the BATV public key in DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 month ago
I'm a little confused on the difference between the sender address and the envelope address. Does BATV apply to both, or just one? I'll need to read the question carefully to make sure I understand which addresses it's referring to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident about BATV. I'm pretty sure the FortiMail device inserts the tag, not the sender. And I think it uses symmetric keys, not public/private. I'll double-check those details, but I feel good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
2 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. I know BATV has something to do with verifying bounce addresses, so I'll focus on that. The key is probably publishing the public key, but I'm not sure if that's required or just an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
2 months ago
I think I've seen BATV before, but I'm not totally sure how it works. I'll need to review the details on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel