Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 7 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 7
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

Which two statements about bounce address tagging and verification (BATV) on FortiMail are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Salena at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Theola
26 days ago
D sounds wrong too. BATV uses asymmetric keys, not symmetric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
1 month ago
I feel like B is misleading. Empty sender addresses shouldn't be verified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
1 month ago
I agree, A is definitely true. But I’m unsure about C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 month ago
I think A and C are correct. The public key needs to be in DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
Totally agree with A) and C), those are solid facts!
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
2 months ago
D) using symmetric keys? That seems a bit outdated, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B)? Empty sender addresses? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I think C) is correct too, the BATV tag goes in the envelope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
A) is definitely true, gotta have that DNS TXT record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
2 months ago
Haha, who needs BATV when you can just use a good old-fashioned spam filter?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
3 months ago
A and C make the most sense to me. Solid choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
3 months ago
B is just plain wrong. Who sends emails with an empty sender address?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
3 months ago
D is the way to go. Symmetric keys are the way of the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
4 months ago
A and C are correct. Gotta love that BATV!
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
4 months ago
I recall BATV using asymmetric keys, so I'm hesitant about D being true; it seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think C is correct since FortiMail usually modifies the sender address for tagging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
4 months ago
I'm not so sure about B; I feel like emails with empty sender addresses might not even be processed for bounce verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
4 months ago
I think option A is definitely true because I remember reading about needing to publish the BATV public key in DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
4 months ago
I'm a little confused on the difference between the sender address and the envelope address. Does BATV apply to both, or just one? I'll need to read the question carefully to make sure I understand which addresses it's referring to.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about BATV. I'm pretty sure the FortiMail device inserts the tag, not the sender. And I think it uses symmetric keys, not public/private. I'll double-check those details, but I feel good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. I know BATV has something to do with verifying bounce addresses, so I'll focus on that. The key is probably publishing the public key, but I'm not sure if that's required or just an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
I think I've seen BATV before, but I'm not totally sure how it works. I'll need to review the details on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Gregg
15 days ago
Yeah, and I think the tag gets added to the sender address too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
20 days ago
I remember something about publishing the BATV key in DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel