Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

You are creating the CLI script to be used on a new SD-WAN deployment You will have branches with a different number of internet connections and want to be sure there is no need to change the Performance SLA configuration in case more connections are added to the branch.

The current configuration is:

Which configuration do you use for the Performance SLA members?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0

Configuring Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0

by Gaynell at Jan 26, 2026, 09:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lamonica
1 day ago
Haha, "Any" is the way to go. Ain't nobody got time for that manual config nonsense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
6 days ago
"Any" is the obvious choice here. Who wants to deal with manual config changes, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
12 days ago
I'd go with the "Any" option to avoid having to update the config every time a new connection is added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
17 days ago
The "Any" option seems like the way to go to future-proof the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
22 days ago
Use the "Any" option for the Performance SLA members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
27 days ago
I think we should look into using a loop in the script to handle the connections, but I'm not entirely confident about the implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
I feel like we covered this in our last session, but I can't recall the exact syntax for adding multiple members without hardcoding them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
2 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to configure SLA for different branches. I think we might need to use a wildcard or a template approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
2 months ago
I remember we discussed how to set up Performance SLA for multiple connections, but I'm not sure if we need to use a specific command for dynamic scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I want to make sure I fully grasp what the requirements are before I start trying to come up with a solution. Let me re-read this a few times to make sure I understand it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
2 months ago
Okay, I see the current configuration. I think the key here is to set up the Performance SLA members in a way that can accommodate different numbers of internet connections at the branches. I'll need to think through the best approach for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like it could be tricky. I'll need to make sure I understand the requirements around not needing to change the configuration if more connections are added. Maybe I can find a way to make the configuration flexible and scalable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
3 months ago
I think I need to look closely at the current configuration and understand how the Performance SLA members are set up. That will give me a good starting point for determining the appropriate configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel