Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

You are creating the CLI script to be used on a new SD-WAN deployment You will have branches with a different number of internet connections and want to be sure there is no need to change the Performance SLA configuration in case more connections are added to the branch.The current configuration is:Which configuration do you use for the Performance SLA members?
B) set members 0
C) current configuration already fulfills the requirement
A) set members any
D) set members all

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

You are creating the CLI script to be used on a new SD-WAN deployment You will have branches with a different number of internet connections and want to be sure there is no need to change the Performance SLA configuration in case more connections are added to the branch.

The current configuration is:

Which configuration do you use for the Performance SLA members?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0

Configuring Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0

by Gaynell at Jan 26, 2026, 09:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gwenn
6 days ago
A static config might be safer for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
11 days ago
But what if it complicates troubleshooting?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
16 days ago
Agreed, it makes scaling easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
2 months ago
I think we should use a dynamic configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
Just make sure to test it after adding new connections!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I think you should specify the minimum bandwidth for each connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
3 months ago
Wait, does that really work with varying connection numbers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
3 months ago
Totally agree, that way it scales automatically!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
3 months ago
You can set the SLA members to use all available connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
3 months ago
Haha, "Any" is the way to go. Ain't nobody got time for that manual config nonsense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
3 months ago
"Any" is the obvious choice here. Who wants to deal with manual config changes, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
3 months ago
I'd go with the "Any" option to avoid having to update the config every time a new connection is added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
The "Any" option seems like the way to go to future-proof the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
4 months ago
Use the "Any" option for the Performance SLA members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
4 months ago
I think we should look into using a loop in the script to handle the connections, but I'm not entirely confident about the implementation details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
I feel like we covered this in our last session, but I can't recall the exact syntax for adding multiple members without hardcoding them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
5 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to configure SLA for different branches. I think we might need to use a wildcard or a template approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how to set up Performance SLA for multiple connections, but I'm not sure if we need to use a specific command for dynamic scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I want to make sure I fully grasp what the requirements are before I start trying to come up with a solution. Let me re-read this a few times to make sure I understand it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
5 months ago
Okay, I see the current configuration. I think the key here is to set up the Performance SLA members in a way that can accommodate different numbers of internet connections at the branches. I'll need to think through the best approach for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like it could be tricky. I'll need to make sure I understand the requirements around not needing to change the configuration if more connections are added. Maybe I can find a way to make the configuration flexible and scalable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
6 months ago
I think I need to look closely at the current configuration and understand how the Performance SLA members are set up. That will give me a good starting point for determining the appropriate configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Marleen
9 hours ago
I agree, understanding the current setup is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel