MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
You need to create a base SD-WAN configuration that includes SD-WAN rules and Performance SLAs for spoke sites with various connectivity types. It needs to be done in a way that can be easily applied to new sites with a minimum amount of change. How should you create the SD-WAN zones?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
A is correct because using network-overlay id allows you to configure multiple ADVPN tunnels on a single interface with a single IP address on the DC FortiGate. This is explained in the FortiGate Administration Guide under ADVPN > Configuring ADVPN > Configuring ADVPN on the hub. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/978793/advpn https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/978793/advpn/978794/configuring-advpn
34 comments · newest first
FI
Filiberto
10 months ago
B could work too, but it might limit some configurations.
JU
Juan
11 months ago
Definitely A, overlay interfaces are key for performance.
JE
Jerry
11 months ago
Surprised that C is even an option, that doesn't make sense!
LI
Lindy
11 months ago
I disagree, B might be simpler for new sites.
JO
Jordan
11 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice for flexibility.
JO
Jodi
12 months ago
I feel like option D could be a valid approach too, especially if we want to keep things flexible for future site additions.
LE
Leatha
12 months ago
I recall that having no members configured could lead to issues, but I can't remember if that was specifically for SD-WAN zones.
GE
Gerri
12 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on interface assignments. I feel like option A might be the right choice, but I’m a bit uncertain.
DE
Deangelo
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having members assigned to the SD-WAN zones, but I'm not sure if we need to specify overlay interfaces.
CH
Cheryl
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if leaving the interfaces unspecified is the best approach. Wouldn't it be better to assign the overlay interfaces to the zones so that the configuration is more complete and easier to deploy?
EZ
Ezekiel
1 year ago
Based on the question, I'd say the best approach is to create the zones with members but without assigning specific interfaces. That way we can easily apply the zones to new sites without having to change a lot of the configuration.
GL
Glory
1 year ago
I'm a little confused about the difference between the options. Do we need to assign overlay interfaces to the zones, or can we leave them unspecified?
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward SD-WAN configuration question. I think the key is to create the zones in a way that can be easily applied to new sites without a lot of changes.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
You know, if they really want to test our SD-WAN skills, they should throw in a few questions about troubleshooting the WiFi at the remote office. That's where the real challenges lie!
CO
Colby
1 year ago
Yeah, setting up SD-WAN zones with overlay interfaces seems like the best approach for easy application to new sites.
TA
Tammi
1 year ago
But for this question, I think the answer is A) With members and assign overlay interfaces.
MA
Margarett
1 year ago
I agree, troubleshooting WiFi can be a real headache sometimes.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
Option B it is! Keep it simple, stupid. That's my motto. Although, I do wonder if the exam writers are trying to trick us with these 'easy' questions. Better double-check my work just in case.
VE
Verlene
1 year ago
Definitely, better safe than sorry when it comes to exams.
CA
Cary
1 year ago
I always double-check my work too, can't be too careful with these exams.
HE
Herminia
1 year ago
I agree, simplicity is key when setting up configurations.
DO
Dona
1 year ago
Option B it is! Keep it simple, stupid. That's my motto.
TH
Theola
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards Option A. Assigning the overlay interfaces upfront might be a bit more work, but it could help ensure a consistent configuration across all sites. Either way, I'm glad I don't have to deal with this on a daily basis. My job is to just take the test and pass!
JE
Jess
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It might take a bit more work upfront, but it will definitely help maintain consistency.
YA
Yasuko
1 year ago
User 1: I think Option A is the way to go. It will make it easier to apply the configuration to new sites.
SA
Sang
2 years ago
I agree with Lera. Option B is the best choice here. It's all about making the configuration scalable and easy to maintain. Who wants to deal with a bunch of manual changes every time a new site is added?
LE
Lera
2 years ago
Option B seems the way to go. Creating zones without interface assignments allows for more flexibility when applying the configuration to new sites. The key is to keep things simple and modular.
EF
Effie
1 year ago
I think it depends on the specific requirements of the network and how much flexibility is needed for future changes.
VE
Velda
1 year ago
That's true, having members and assigning overlay interfaces can help with organization and management.
AY
Ayesha
1 year ago
But wouldn't it be better to have members and assign overlay interfaces for better organization?
JO
Jose
1 year ago
I agree, keeping the zones without interface assignments makes it easier to apply the configuration to new sites.
JE
Jettie
2 years ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It would allow for easy application to new sites with minimal changes.
LA
Laticia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) With members and assign interfaces but do not specify a gateway.
JE
Jettie
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) With members and assign overlay interfaces.