Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.A customer reports that they are not able to reach subnet 10.10.10.0/24 from their FortiGate device.Based on the exhibit, what should you do to correct the situation?
A) Enable iBGP multipath
B) Enable recursive resolution for BGP routes
C) Enable next-hop-self feature
D) Enable additional-path feature

Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer reports that they are not able to reach subnet 10.10.10.0/24 from their FortiGate device.

Based on the exhibit, what should you do to correct the situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A is correct because using network-overlay id allows you to configure multiple ADVPN tunnels on a single interface with a single IP address on the DC FortiGate. This is explained in the FortiGate Administration Guide under ADVPN > Configuring ADVPN > Configuring ADVPN on the hub. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/978793/advpn https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/978793/advpn/978794/configuring-advpn


by Beatriz at Dec 10, 2024, 02:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE8_812 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Olive
7 months ago
Additional-path feature could help, but not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
8 months ago
Definitely need to check the routing table first before making changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
8 months ago
Surprised that enabling iBGP multipath is even an option for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
8 months ago
I disagree, next-hop-self feature seems more relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
8 months ago
Looks like enabling recursive resolution for BGP routes is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
9 months ago
I think enabling iBGP multipath was mentioned in a different context, but I'm not confident it applies to this specific subnet issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
9 months ago
I vaguely recall that enabling recursive resolution can sometimes solve reachability problems, but I need to double-check if that's applicable here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
9 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to troubleshoot BGP routes. I think enabling next-hop-self might help, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
9 months ago
I remember studying BGP configurations, but I'm not entirely sure which option directly addresses the reachability issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
Aha, this is a classic routing problem! I bet the issue is with the next-hop configuration. Enabling next-hop-self should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
9 months ago
Okay, the exhibit shows some BGP settings, so I think the answer is likely related to BGP configuration. I'll need to understand the purpose of the different BGP features mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
9 months ago
Hmm, the question mentions a FortiGate device, so I'm guessing the issue is with the firewall configuration. I'll need to check the routing table and security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
9 months ago
This looks like a routing issue, so I'll need to carefully review the network topology and BGP configuration to determine the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 year ago
This question is like a game of 'Where's Waldo?' - the exhibit is nowhere to be found! I guess I'll have to rely on my network troubleshooting skills to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through. The options seem to be related to BGP configuration, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach here. I might need to dig deeper into the network topology.
upvoted 0 times
Edna
1 year ago
User 3: Good point. Let's check the routing table first to see if the subnet is even being advertised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
1 year ago
User 2: No, I haven't. Maybe we should start there before diving into BGP configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
User 1: Have you checked the routing table on the FortiGate device?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paola
1 year ago
Haha, the question says 'Refer to the exhibit', but there's no exhibit to be seen. Is this a trick question or what?
upvoted 0 times
Talia
1 year ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregg
1 year ago
Ah, the classic 'can't reach the subnet' problem. I bet it's a misconfigured static route or a missing dynamic routing protocol.
upvoted 0 times
Pearlene
1 year ago
Could be a next-hop issue, check that configuration
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 year ago
Make sure the subnet is correctly advertised in BGP
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 year ago
Maybe the dynamic routing protocol is not running properly
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 year ago
Check the static routes first
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Son
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a routing issue. I'd start by checking the routing table and the interface configurations on the FortiGate device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling additional-path feature could also be a possible solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
1 year ago
I agree with Mozell, enabling next-hop-self feature should help resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C) Enable next-hop-self feature.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel