Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE8_812 Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

Review the VPN configuration shown in the exhibit.

What is the Forward Error Correction behavior if the SD-WAN network traffic download is 500 Mbps and has 8% of packet loss in the environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A is correct because using network-overlay id allows you to configure multiple ADVPN tunnels on a single interface with a single IP address on the DC FortiGate. This is explained in the FortiGate Administration Guide under ADVPN > Configuring ADVPN > Configuring ADVPN on the hub. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/978793/advpn https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/978793/advpn/978794/configuring-advpn


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gail
27 days ago
I bet the designers of this network had a field day trying to optimize the FEC settings. Whoever gets this right is going to be the envy of their team.
upvoted 0 times
Martha
11 days ago
B) 3 redundant packet for every 5 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
21 days ago
A) 1 redundant packet for every 10 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marge
1 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. 500 Mbps download with 8% packet loss... I'm going to have to run the numbers on this one. Hope I don't get a migraine trying to solve it!
upvoted 0 times
Loreta
17 days ago
C) 2 redundant packet for every 8 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
22 days ago
B) 3 redundant packet for every 5 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
28 days ago
A) 1 redundant packet for every 10 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hermila
2 months ago
Ah, the classic SD-WAN FEC dilemma. If I had a nickel for every time I had to figure this out, I'd be sipping margaritas on a beach somewhere.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
21 days ago
B) 3 redundant packet for every 5 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
1 months ago
A) 1 redundant packet for every 10 base packets
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catherin
2 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Maybe I need to reconsider my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
2 months ago
Hmm, looks like we need to find the right balance between redundancy and bandwidth usage. I'm not sure if I'd go for 3 redundant packets per 5 base packets - that seems a bit overkill for an 8% packet loss scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
4 days ago
Noemi: That's a good point, we should aim for balance in our configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
20 days ago
User 3: Option C, 2 redundant packets for every 8 base packets, could be a good middle ground.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
27 days ago
User 2: Maybe we should consider option A, 1 redundant packet for every 10 base packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, 3 redundant packets for every 5 base packets does seem excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) 2 redundant packet for every 8 base packets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) 1 redundant packet for every 10 base packets.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel