Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE7_EFW-7.2 Topic 5 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_EFW-7.2 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 5
[All NSE7_EFW-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

which contains a partial configuration of the global system. What can you conclude from this output?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The configuration does not show any explicit disabling of NPs (Network Processors) or CPs (Content Processors).In Fortinet Enterprise Firewall, unless explicitly disabled, these processors are enabled by default to handle specific types of traffic efficiently12.Reference:=Hardware acceleration | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.2.2 - Fortinet Documentation,NSE 7 Network Security Architect - Fortinet


by Venita at Jan 25, 2024, 10:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE7_EFW-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Felix
1 years ago
Yeah, and option C says only NPs are disabled. That could also be the case, but again, we need more context to be certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
1 years ago
I agree, option D is the way to go. It's the only one that really aligns with the information provided in the exhibit. Though I have to say, these certification exams really keep you on your toes, don't they?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
1 years ago
Hmm, that leaves option D. 'NPs and CPs are disabled.' That seems the most plausible to me, given the 'partial configuration' clue.
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
1 years ago
Absolutely, option D 'NPs and CPs are disabled' aligns with the partial configuration shown in the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 years ago
So, we can confidently say that option D is the correct answer based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
1 years ago
That's a good point, the absence of enabled interfaces supports the conclusion that both NPs and CPs are disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 years ago
It's because there are no enabled interfaces in the configuration, so both NPs and CPs must be disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
1 years ago
But how can we be sure that both NPs and CPs are disabled?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
1 years ago
I agree, option D 'NPs and CPs are disabled' makes sense based on the partial configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
1 years ago
Haha, good one! Well, I think we've got a solid consensus on option D. Time to move on to the next head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel