Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FWB-6.4 Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FWB-6.4 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
[All NSE6_FWB-6.4 Questions]

You are using HTTP content routing on FortiWeb. Requests for web app A should be forwarded to a cluster of web servers which all host the same web app. Requests for web app B should be forwarded to a different, single web server.

Which is true about the solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Na
23 days ago
Yo, what's up with these answer choices? They're making my head spin like a top!
upvoted 0 times
Domonique
5 days ago
A) Static or policy-based routes are not required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitzie
1 months ago
I think option A is correct. Static or policy-based routes shouldn't be required for HTTP content routing on FortiWeb.
upvoted 0 times
Wilson
10 days ago
C) You must put the single web server into a server pool in order to use it with HTTP content routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
15 days ago
B) To achieve HTTP content routing, you must chain policies: the first policy accepts all traffic, and forwards requests for web app A to the virtual server for policy A. It also forwards requests for web app B to the virtual server for policy B. Policy A and Policy B apply their app-specific protection profiles, and then distribute that app's traffic among all members of the server farm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
24 days ago
A) Static or policy-based routes are not required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindy
1 months ago
Ha! Putting a single server in a pool, that's a new one. Option C is definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Carmela
5 days ago
Yeah, chaining policies seems like the right approach for routing requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
17 days ago
I think option B is the correct way to achieve HTTP content routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 months ago
I agree, putting a single server in a pool doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
2 months ago
I disagree with option D. The server policy should apply app-specific protection profiles, not the same one for all apps.
upvoted 0 times
Claudio
15 days ago
User 2: I agree, option B seems to be the most accurate for HTTP content routing on FortiWeb.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
22 days ago
User 1: I think option B is correct. It mentions chaining policies for different web apps.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C might also be correct. Putting the single web server into a server pool could be necessary for routing requests properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
2 months ago
I agree with you, Raymon. Policy-based routing seems like the way to go for HTTP content routing on FortiWeb.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most comprehensive solution to me. Chaining policies to handle different web apps makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Devon
2 days ago
User 4: Plus, it ensures that each web app gets the necessary protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
5 days ago
User 3: It definitely helps in managing and securing the traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
20 days ago
User 2: I agree, chaining policies for different web apps is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
1 months ago
User 1: Option B seems like the most comprehensive solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
2 months ago
I think the answer is B because it mentions chaining policies to forward requests for different web apps to different servers.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel