Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FML-7.2 Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FML-7.2 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 2
[All NSE6_FML-7.2 Questions]

A FortiMail administrator is investigating a sudden increase in DSNs being delivered to their protected domain. After searching the logs, the administrator identifies that the DSNs were not generated because of any outbound email sent from their organization.

Which FortiMail antispam technique can the administrator use to prevent this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Lavonda at Jun 29, 2024, 02:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FML-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Emily
2 months ago
Bounce address tag validation? More like 'bounce address tag validation, please!' Amirite? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
23 days ago
C: Spam outbreak protection could also help in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
29 days ago
B: I agree, it's important to validate bounce addresses to prevent DSNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
1 months ago
A: Definitely! Bounce address tag validation is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
2 months ago
Bounce address tag validation is the only option that really addresses the issue of unexpected DSNs. The other choices are interesting, but not quite on point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think option D is the way to go. Gotta love those FortiMail anti-spam tricks!
upvoted 0 times
Merlyn
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think FortiGuard IP Reputation could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
1 months ago
I think option C could also be helpful in preventing a spam outbreak like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice to prevent those DSNs from being delivered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
Bounce address tag validation seems like the best choice here. It can help prevent spoofed bounce messages from being delivered.
upvoted 0 times
Juan
1 months ago
D: Let's implement bounce address tag validation as soon as possible to prevent any further issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
1 months ago
C: I agree, we need to make sure our email security measures are up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
2 months ago
B: That sounds like a good idea. It can help protect our domain from DSN attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
2 months ago
A: I think we should use bounce address tag validation to prevent spoofed bounce messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Asuncion
3 months ago
Hmm, looks like the administrator needs a way to validate the bounce addresses. I'd go with option D, Bounce address tag validation.
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
2 months ago
Yes, using bounce address tag validation can help prevent these DSNs from being delivered to the protected domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
3 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Berry
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Bounce address tag validation could also be a good option to prevent these DSNs from being delivered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
4 months ago
I agree with Onita. Spam outbreak protection can help prevent this scenario by detecting and blocking spam outbreaks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) Spam outbreak protection.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel