Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet FCSS_EFW_AD-7.6 Exam - Topic 3 Question 8 Discussion

A FortiGate device using unified threat management (UTM) profiles is reaching resource limits, and you expect traffic in your enterprise network to increase.You received an additional FortiGate of the same model.Which two options should you consider using to integrate the additional FortiGate into your enterprise network? (Choose two.)
A) FortiGate Session Life Support Protocol (FGSP) with external load balancers and B) FortiGate Clustering Protocol (FGCP) in active-active (A-A) mode with switches
C) Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) with switches
D) FortiGate Clustering Protocol (FGCP) in active-passive (A-P) mode with VDOM disabled

Fortinet FCSS_EFW_AD-7.6 Exam - Topic 3 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCSS_EFW_AD-7.6 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 3
[All FCSS_EFW_AD-7.6 Questions]

A FortiGate device using unified threat management (UTM) profiles is reaching resource limits, and you expect traffic in your enterprise network to increase.

You received an additional FortiGate of the same model.

Which two options should you consider using to integrate the additional FortiGate into your enterprise network? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Kristine at Apr 10, 2026, 11:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FCSS_EFW_AD-7.6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Theodora
1 month ago
I think VRRP could work too, but not as efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 month ago
FGCP in active-active mode is a solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
I feel like using FGCP in active-passive mode might be safer for stability, especially with VDOM disabled, but I need to double-check if that limits performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
2 months ago
FGSP sounds familiar, but I can't recall the specifics of how it works with external load balancers. Is it really necessary for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
2 months ago
I remember practicing with VRRP in my labs, and it seems like a solid option for redundancy, but I wonder if it can handle the increased traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
I think FGCP in active-active mode could be a good choice since it allows for better resource utilization, but I'm not entirely sure how it integrates with switches.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel