New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Finra Series-63 Exam - Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Finra's Series-63 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 3
[All Series-63 Questions]

Which of the following does not necessarily have to be included in the contract between an investment adviser and an individual client, according to the Uniform Securities Act (USA)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A statement of the investment policy does not have to be included in the contract between an investment adviser and an individual client. The statement of investment policy is generally developed after the contract is signed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shaniqua
2 months ago
I thought all those details were mandatory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
Wait, can they really not include the investment policy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 months ago
Totally agree, that's a key part!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
3 months ago
B seems like a must-have to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
3 months ago
A contract must include the compensation agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
3 months ago
The investment policy statement seems crucial, but I’m uncertain if it’s legally required to be in the contract. I think I saw a question about this in our review materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
3 months ago
I vaguely remember that if the adviser is a partnership, there are specific notifications required. I’m not entirely clear on whether that’s a must-have in the contract though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
4 months ago
I feel like the assignment clause is pretty standard in contracts, but I can't recall if it’s mandatory under the USA. It seems like a similar question came up in practice exams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I think the compensation agreement is important, but I’m not sure if it has to be included for all clients. I remember something about it being different for wealthier clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
4 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not as familiar with the specific details of the Uniform Securities Act as I'd like to be. I'll have to carefully read through the options and see if I can spot the one that doesn't have to be included.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
4 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The Uniform Securities Act lays out the core requirements for these types of contracts, so I should be able to identify the element that isn't mandatory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The options cover things like compensation, assignment, and partnership changes. I'll need to review my notes on the Uniform Securities Act to determine which of these is not necessarily required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is asking what doesn't have to be included, so I need to think carefully about the different contract elements mentioned and which one might not be required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the specific requirements of the Uniform Securities Act and what it mandates for investment adviser-client contracts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
6 months ago
I'm going with C. The partnership statement doesn't seem mandatory according to the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
6 months ago
I see your point, maybe I was mistaken. A does make more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
6 months ago
I agree with Chanel, A seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
7 months ago
But A makes sense because compensation should not be tied to capital gains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
7 months ago
A is the way to go. The compensation agreement can't be based on capital gains or appreciation for most clients.
upvoted 0 times
Paz
5 months ago
User 3: I think B is also crucial for client protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
5 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it ensures fair compensation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
5 months ago
User 1: I agree, A is important to protect clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sue
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
7 months ago
Haha, imagine if the contract had to include a notification every time the investment adviser's partners changed. Talk about micromanaging!
upvoted 0 times
James
5 months ago
B) a statement stipulating that the contract cannot be assigned to another party without the client's consent
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
7 months ago
A) the compensation agreement, which cannot be a percentage of the capital gains or capital appreciation earned on the portfolio for all but the wealthiest of individual clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chanel
7 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
7 months ago
D seems like the odd one out here. The investment policy statement should definitely be included in the contract.
upvoted 0 times
Aileen
6 months ago
I think D is the odd one out too. The investment policy should definitely be included in the contract for transparency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
6 months ago
I agree, D does seem out of place. The investment policy statement is crucial for both parties to understand expectations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deeann
8 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. The contract doesn't necessarily have to include a statement about consent for assignment to another party.
upvoted 0 times
Tayna
6 months ago
I agree, the contract doesn't have to include a statement about assignment consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
7 months ago
I think you're right, B seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
7 months ago
User 3: I think the answer is C. The contract should include a statement if the adviser is a partnership.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
7 months ago
User 2: I agree with you, Latanya. It doesn't have to be a percentage for all clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
7 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is A. The compensation agreement doesn't have to be a percentage of capital gains.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel