Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks F5CAB2 Exam - Topic 3 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's F5CAB2 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 3
[All F5CAB2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

During a planned upgrade to a BIG-IP HA pair running Active/Standby, an outage to application traffic is reported shortly after the Active unit is forced to Standby. Reverting the failover resolves the outage. What should the BIG-IP Administrator modify to avoid an outage during the next failover event? (Choose one answer)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (BIG-IP Administration -- Data Plane Concepts):

In an Active/Standby BIG-IP design, application availability during failover depends on both units having equivalent data-plane connectivity for the networks that carry application traffic. Specifically:

VLANs are bound to specific interfaces (and optionally VLAN tags).

Floating self IPs / traffic groups move to the new Active device during failover.

For traffic to continue flowing after failover, the new Active device must have the same VLANs available on the correct interfaces that connect to the upstream/downstream networks.

What the symptom tells you:

Traffic works when Device A is Active

Traffic fails when Device B becomes Active

Failback immediately restores traffic

This pattern strongly indicates the Standby unit does not have the VLAN connected the same way (wrong physical interface assignment), so when it becomes Active, it owns the floating addresses but cannot actually pass traffic on the correct network segment.

Why Interface mismatch is the best match:

If the Active unit is already working, its interface mapping is correct.

The fix is to make the Standby unit's VLAN/interface assignment match the Active unit.

That corresponds to changing the Standby device interface to 1.1.

Why the Tag options are less likely here (given the choices and the exhibit intent):

Tag issues can also break failover traffic, but the question/options are clearly driving toward the classic HA requirement: consistent VLAN-to-interface mapping on both devices so the data plane remains functional after the traffic group moves.

Conclusion: To avoid an outage on the next failover, the BIG-IP Administrator must ensure the Standby device uses the same interface (1.1) for the relevant VLAN(s) that carry the application traffic, so when it becomes Active it can forward/receive traffic normally.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lakeesha
16 hours ago
The Tag value on the Active device is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 days ago
This question is as clear as mud. I'm going to need a bigger boat to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
11 days ago
I agree with Avery. Changing the Tag value on the Active device is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
16 days ago
Haha, who needs a BIG-IP when you can just unplug the router and plug it back in? Problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
21 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Modifying the interface on the Standby device to 1.1 might be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
27 days ago
C) The Tag value on the Active device seems like the right choice to avoid an outage during the next failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
1 month ago
I think the interface settings might be the key here, but I’m torn between the Active and Standby device options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 month ago
I vaguely recall that modifying the Tag value could help with failover issues, but I can't remember which device it was for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
2 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to adjust interface settings. I think it might be related to the Standby device's interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
2 months ago
I remember something about the Tag value being important for failover, but I'm not sure if it should be on the Active or Standby device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
2 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The key is to identify the setting that's most likely to cause an outage during a failover. I'll carefully consider each option and try to eliminate the less likely ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The exhibit doesn't provide a lot of detail, and the answer choices seem pretty similar. I'll need to really think through the HA setup and what could be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
3 months ago
Alright, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll need to focus on the HA settings and see which one is most likely to cause an outage during a failover. Time to read through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question mentions a failover event, so I'm guessing the issue has something to do with the HA configuration. I'll need to consider the different settings that could be causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and think through the potential causes of the outage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel