Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 303 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 303 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All 303 Questions]

In preparation for a maintenance task, an LTM Specialist performs a "Force to Standby" on LTM device Unit 1. LTM device Unit 2 becomes active as expected. The maintenance task requires the reboot of Unit 1. Shortly after the reboot is complete, the LTM Specialist discovers that Unit 1 has become active and Unit 2 has returned to standby.

What would cause this behavior?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ollie
6 days ago
I'm leaning towards B actually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
8 days ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
11 days ago
I'm going with C. It makes the most sense given the scenario. Though I wonder if the LTM Specialist has a history of accidentally pressing the 'Activate Me' button on Unit 1.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
2 hours ago
Maybe the LTM Specialist needs to be more careful with that 'Activate Me' button on Unit 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 days ago
I think it's C too. Auto Failback would explain why Unit 1 became active again.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
17 days ago
Wait, isn't this just a case of Murphy's Law in action? Unit 1 was supposed to be the standby, but it just had to go and become the active one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
21 days ago
Definitely D. The auto failback on the device group is the culprit here, not the traffic group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
23 days ago
Hmm, I think it's C. The auto failback setting on the traffic group would make Unit 1 the active device after the reboot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
25 days ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel