MENU
An LTM Specialist discovers an issue with the custom http monitor that returns in a false positive status.
The end users cannot get the right website, but the http monitor marks the pool member UP.
What is causing the false positive result?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 303 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
CA
Caprice
6 months ago
Definitely not the browser. Compression seems like the most likely culprit here.
SA
Salley
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards the compressed response too. It can mess with the monitor's checks.
SH
Shaniqua
7 months ago
I feel like the Content-Type being "iso-8859-200" is a red flag. Could confuse the monitor.
LA
Lai
7 months ago
I agree, but what about the chunked response? That might also lead to false positives.
MA
Margery
7 months ago
This question is tricky. I think the response being compressed could cause issues.
AZ
Azalee
7 months ago
Definitely sounds like a misconfiguration with the monitor itself.
ZA
Zana
7 months ago
A different browser won't fix this, that's for sure.
SH
Shawnda
8 months ago
Surprised that the Content-Type could affect the monitor like that!
BR
Brittni
8 months ago
Chunked response, huh? Looks like the LTM Specialist has some troubleshooting to do.
LO
Long
8 months ago
Another browser? Nah, the monitor should work across all browsers.
RE
Rene
8 months ago
Content-Type "iso-8859-200"? What is this, the 1990s?
SU
Sunny
9 months ago
Compressed response? Sounds like a job for the LTM Specialist!
LY
Lynna
9 months ago
The response is chunked. That's the issue.
TR
Truman
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards the chunked response being the culprit, but I wish I had more clarity on how that impacts the monitor's status.
LO
Lorean
9 months ago
I feel like the Content-Type might not be the main issue, but I can't recall if it could lead to a false positive.
BR
Breana
9 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where compression affected the monitor's ability to read the response correctly. Could that be it?
ST
Stephaine
10 months ago
I remember something about how chunked responses can confuse monitors, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the issue here.
ER
Erasmo
10 months ago
I've seen issues like this before where a caching or compression setting was causing the monitor to report the wrong status. I'll make sure to thoroughly investigate those areas.
RO
Rocco
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. If the end users can't access the website, but the monitor says it's up, that suggests the monitor is not accurately reflecting the actual user experience. I'll focus on the network and application-level factors that could be causing that discrepancy.
NA
Nadine
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the "iso-8859-200" Content-Type option. That doesn't seem like a standard encoding to me, so I'll probably rule that one out.
SE
Selene
10 months ago
I disagree, I think it's the compressed response causing issues.
DE
Delisa
10 months ago
It's probably the response is chunked.
JA
Jacqueline
11 months ago
I think using another browser is a stretch. The monitor should work regardless of that.
TR
Trinidad
11 months ago
The response being chunked or compressed could definitely cause issues with the monitor. I'll need to look into those possibilities more closely.
PR
Providencia
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options and think through the possible causes of the false positive.
GO
Golda
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards the response being chunked as well.
AL
Albina
6 months ago
I doubt the browser choice is the problem here.
GW
Gwenn
6 months ago
Maybe it's the compression causing the false positive?
AL
Alease
6 months ago
I think the response being chunked could be the issue.
FE
Felicitas
11 months ago
What about the Content-Type? That could be a factor too.