F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 5 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 5

[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibit.

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting a new HTTP monitor on a pool. The pool member is functioning correctly when accessed directly through a browser, although the monitor is marking the member as down. As part of the troubleshooting, the LTM Specialist has captured the monitor traffic via tcpdump.

How should the LTM Specialist resolve this issue?

AAdd the 'http' monitor to the pool.

BAdd the 'icmp' monitor to the node.

CModify the receive string to valid content.

DCorrect the firewall rules on the pool member.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Elvera at May 03, 2022, 02:06 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Weldon

4 months ago

Definitely not A, that won't fix the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

My

4 months ago

Surprised the firewall rules could be the problem here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

4 months ago

Adding an ICMP monitor won't help with HTTP issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

4 months ago

I think modifying the receive string is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

5 months ago

The HTTP monitor needs to match the response content.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bev

5 months ago

I wonder if there’s a firewall issue. We talked about how firewalls can block monitor traffic, but I’m not confident about that being the main problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

5 months ago

This reminds me of a practice question where we had to adjust the receive string. I think that could be the key here too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

5 months ago

I’m not entirely sure, but I think adding an ICMP monitor wouldn’t help since the pool member is already reachable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherly

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how the receive string in HTTP monitors needs to match the expected response. Maybe that's why it's marking the member down?

upvoted 0 times

...

Quiana

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'm not sure if I fully understand the differences between the Recovery Services vault, Azure Backup, and MABS. I'll need to review my notes on these Azure services.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

5 months ago

This looks like a straightforward question on project scope management. I'll focus on the key factors mentioned, like requirements, development approach, and validation.

upvoted 0 times

...