Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 5 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 5
[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibits.

An LTM device has been configured for load balancing a number of different application servers. Configuration changes need to be made to the LTM device to allow administrative management of the servers in 172.16.10/24, 172.16.20/24, and 172.16.30/24 networks. The servers require outbound access to numerous destinations for operations.

Which solution has the simplest configuration changes while maintaining functionality and basic security?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Mitsue at May 10, 2022, 01:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tegan
5 months ago
B covers all networks without overcomplicating things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
5 months ago
A is too broad, better to keep it specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
5 months ago
Surprised that D is even an option, seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
5 months ago
I disagree, C is way more secure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
6 months ago
Option B seems like the simplest fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it seems to balance functionality and security, but I can't recall if we covered that specific scenario in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage VLANs, and I feel like enabling on egress VLANs could lead to issues with outbound traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
6 months ago
I think option B might be the simplest since it consolidates the subnets into one, but I’m a bit unsure about the security implications of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how enabling specific subnets on ingress VLANs can help with security, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to configure the igmps-flood-traffic and igmps-flood-report settings correctly on the ICL trunks to ensure multicast traffic is properly pruned. I'll make sure to select the right combination of settings to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky XML schema question. I'll need to carefully review the schema snippet and options to determine which element is valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know gout is related to uric acid, but I'm not sure about the other details. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel