F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam

Question #: 96
Topic #: 2

[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibit.

Which profile could be removed or changed on this virtual server to reduce CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server side bandwidth usage?

Atcp

Bhttp

Chttpcompression

Doptimized-caching

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Staci at Sep 08, 2024, 09:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cathern

3 months ago

Hey, I got an idea! Why don't we just overclock the LTM device? That'll show that CPU who's boss. Then we can crank up all the profiles to the max and let the server take a break. Problem solved, baby!

upvoted 0 times

Marla

1 months ago

D) optimized-caching

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonne

2 months ago

C) httpcompression

upvoted 0 times

...

Mose

2 months ago

B) http

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

2 months ago

A) tcp

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

3 months ago

Whoa, hold up! What if we just unplug the whole LTM device and let the server handle it all? That's gotta be the ultimate CPU-saver, right? I mean, who needs load balancing when you've got pure server power!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nikita

3 months ago

Hmm, let me think... I'd say the HTTP profile. Why? Because if you remove it, the LTM won't have to deal with all those pesky HTTP headers and whatnot. Plus, the server can just spit out raw data. Boom, CPU load reduced!

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

3 months ago

Dude, this is easy. It's gotta be the TCP profile. I mean, who needs all that fancy HTTP stuff when you can just strip it down to the bare essentials, right? Less processing, less CPU load. Simple as that!

upvoted 0 times

Telma

1 months ago

True, but I still think TCP profile is the most straightforward option to go with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beth

2 months ago

I see your point, but optimized-caching could also be a good choice to reduce CPU load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zona

2 months ago

But what about HTTP compression? Wouldn't that help reduce CPU load as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Fredric

2 months ago

I think you're right, TCP profile seems like the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorriane

3 months ago

Ooh, a trick question! I bet it's the optimized-caching profile. Reduce the CPU load by letting the LTM handle the caching, and the server doesn't have to work harder. Yeah, that's the one!

upvoted 0 times

Laine

2 months ago

I see your point, but I still think optimized-caching is the better option in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glen

3 months ago

But what about httpcompression? Wouldn't that also help in reducing CPU load?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

3 months ago

I think you're right, optimized-caching would be the best choice to reduce CPU load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherri

4 months ago

Hmm, let's see. If we want to reduce the CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server-side bandwidth usage, I'd say the HTTP compression profile is the way to go. Less processing on the LTM, and the server doesn't have to work harder. Seems like a win-win to me!

upvoted 0 times