-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --
Refer to the exhibit.
An LTM Specialist configures a virtual server to load balance to a pool of FTP servers. File transfers are failing. The virtual server is configured as follows:
ltm virtual ftp_vs {
destination 10.10.1.103:ftp
ip-protocol tcp
mask 255.255.255.255
pool ftp_pool
profiles {
tcp { }
}
vlans-disabled
}
Which change will resolve the problem?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 301b Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
VE
Veronika
5 days ago
Good point! Monitoring first, then we can adjust profiles if needed.
JU
Jules
10 days ago
Let's stick with A for now. It feels like the safest bet.
DE
Denna
15 days ago
Exactly! Without monitoring, how will we know if it's working?
SH
Sharee
20 days ago
Right, monitoring is key for file transfers.
AR
Arthur
25 days ago
D seems unnecessary. TCP timeout isn't the main issue here.
VE
Veronika
1 month ago
I feel like C could be a solution. Loose initiation might fix it.
JU
Jules
1 month ago
But what about B? An FTP profile might help too.
DE
Denna
1 month ago
I agree, adding an FTP monitor makes sense.
SH
Sharee
2 months ago
This question is tricky. I think A could be the answer.
AR
Artie
2 months ago
Definitely, monitoring should be the priority here.
EZ
Ezekiel
2 months ago
Right, we need to address the root cause first.
AD
Adelle
2 months ago
Increasing the TCP timeout might help, but it feels like a workaround.
ED
Edison
2 months ago
I feel like enabling loose initiation could also be a solution.
FL
Fletcher
2 months ago
True, but the monitor seems more urgent for file transfers.
DE
Delisa
3 months ago
But what about adding an FTP profile? That could help too.
AR
Artie
3 months ago
Agreed, without a monitor, we can't check server health.
EZ
Ezekiel
3 months ago
I think adding an FTP monitor to the pool is crucial.
CH
Chara
3 months ago
Surprised there's no FTP profile already set up!
ER
Erinn
3 months ago
Definitely not C, loose initiation isn't the fix for FTP issues.
JA
Jannette
3 months ago
Wait, why is the TCP timeout even an issue here?
MA
Maryann
4 months ago
I think we need an FTP profile on the virtual server instead.
SH
Shenika
4 months ago
Adding an FTP monitor to the pool seems like the right move.
JE
Jesusita
4 months ago
Increasing the TCP timeout value sounds like it could help, but I’m not convinced it’s the main issue. I’d lean towards adding the FTP monitor instead.
AM
Amie
6 months ago
I feel like we had a similar question in practice where adjusting the TCP settings helped. Maybe enabling loose initiation could be the key here?
EU
Eun
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think adding an FTP profile might be necessary for the virtual server to handle FTP traffic correctly.
CA
Carylon
6 months ago
I remember we talked about how important it is to have a proper monitor for the pool. Adding an FTP monitor could definitely help with the file transfers.