New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 1 Question 118 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 118
Topic #: 1
[All 301b Questions]

An LTM Specialist needs to rewrite text within an HTML response from a web server. A client is sending the HTTP request below:

GET / HTTP/1.1

Host: www.f5.com

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0

Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8

Accept-LanguagE. en-US,en;q=0.5

Accept-EncodinG. gzip, deflate

Cache-Control: no-cache

Connection: keep-alive

CookiE. somecookie=1

Although a stream profile has been added to the virtual server, the content within the HTTP response is NOT being matched, and therefore NOT modified.

Which HTTP header should the LTM Specialist remove from the request to ensure the content can be matched and modified?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Malinda
1 day ago
Definitely not the Connection header!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
7 days ago
I think it's the Cache-Control header, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
12 days ago
Gotta remove the Accept-Encoding header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
17 days ago
D) Accept-Encoding, for sure. But I'm just wondering, does the LTM Specialist have a secret passion for poetry or something? Rewriting text, how romantic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
22 days ago
D) Accept-Encoding, easy peasy. Though I'm still trying to figure out why the LTM Specialist needs to rewrite the text in the first place. Seems like a lot of work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
27 days ago
D) Accept-Encoding, no doubt about it. Removing that header should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
1 month ago
I feel like the Connection header is often ignored, but I'm not confident if it would impact content matching in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question where removing the Cache-Control header helped with response modifications. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the Accept header being important for content negotiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 months ago
I think it might be the Accept-Encoding header since it can affect how the response is compressed and processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards the Accept header being the culprit. If the content type isn't being matched, that header could be interfering with the process. I'll make sure to double-check that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
2 months ago
Okay, let's see. The request is including the Accept-Encoding header, which could be causing the content to be modified in a way that prevents matching. I'd try removing that header first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with D) Accept-Encoding. Seems like the obvious choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
2 months ago
I agree, D) Accept-Encoding is the way to go. Gotta love those pesky HTTP headers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
3 months ago
D) Accept-Encoding is the correct answer. Removing this header will ensure the content can be matched and modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions a stream profile being added, so I'm wondering if the issue is with the way the profile is configured rather than a specific header. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
3 months ago
I think the key here is to look at what headers are being sent in the request and determine which one might be interfering with the content matching. The Cache-Control header seems like a good place to start.
upvoted 0 times
Wilbert
2 months ago
But what about the Connection header?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I agree, Cache-Control could be the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel