Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 1 Question 127 Discussion

An LTM device is monitoring three pool members. One pool member is being marked down.What should the LTM Specialist enable to prevent the server from being flooded with connections once its monitor determines it is up?
D) slow ramp timer
A) manual resume
B) packet shaping
C) hold down timer
E) fastest load balance algorithm

F5 Networks 301b Exam - Topic 1 Question 127 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 127
Topic #: 1
[All 301b Questions]

An LTM device is monitoring three pool members. One pool member is being marked down.

What should the LTM Specialist enable to prevent the server from being flooded with connections once its monitor determines it is up?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Belen at May 29, 2026, 10:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Taryn
4 hours ago
Fastest load balance algorithm? Too aggressive for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
5 days ago
I’m leaning towards packet shaping. It controls traffic effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
10 days ago
Slow ramp timer is also good. Gradual connections are safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
16 days ago
Manual resume could work, but it’s risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
21 days ago
I agree, hold down timer makes sense. Gives time to stabilize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
26 days ago
I think the hold down timer is the best choice. It prevents immediate flooding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 month ago
Surprised that people aren't considering packet shaping!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 month ago
Manual resume seems risky, not a fan of that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
1 month ago
Wait, isn't the slow ramp timer better for this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
2 months ago
Definitely agree, it helps manage the connection flood!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
2 months ago
I think the hold down timer is the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I feel like packet shaping might be useful, but I don't recall it being specifically for this scenario. I should probably lean towards the slow ramp timer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether to choose manual resume or the hold down timer. They both seem relevant to managing server states.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the slow ramp timer helps manage connections when a server comes back online.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I think we talked about hold down timers in class, but I'm not entirely sure how they work in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel