Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301a Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 8
[All 301a Questions]

A company plans to launch a huge marketing campaign and expects increase demand of their secure website. With the current virtual server setup, the LTM Specialist expects that the LTM device will reach its capacity limits. For the wen application to function properly. Cookies persistence is required. The LTM Specialist needs to reduce LTM device load without breaking the application.

Which two settings should the LTM Specialist modify to meet the requirement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

It is required that cookie persist must be used and http profile must be used, and SSL offloading must also be required. It must be in standard mode, excluding BD E.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Deeanna
19 days ago
Hah, Louvenia is thinking outside the box! I like it. The web acceleration profile could definitely be the culprit here. But I'm still a little worried about the cookies persistence. Maybe a combination of that and the HTTP compression profile removal would be the best approach?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
21 days ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of performance vs. security. You guys are on the right track, but I've got a wild card for ya - what about disabling the web acceleration profile? That could free up some resources without compromising the cookies persistence or the secure connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
22 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the performance (Layer 4) option. Wouldn't that remove some of the security features? I think I'd go with the HTTP compression profile removal. It's less risky, and it could still help reduce the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
23 days ago
Ooh, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4) because that could reduce the load without affecting the cookies persistence. But I'm not 100% sure, maybe we should ask the LTM Specialist for more details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
25 days ago
I agree with Lennie, those seem like the most viable options. Removing the HTTP profile or the web acceleration profile could potentially break the application, and removing the ClientSSL profile would defeat the purpose of the secure website.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
27 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. The LTM Specialist needs to reduce the device load without breaking the application, and cookies persistence is required. I'm thinking either removing the HTTP compression profile or modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4) might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel