New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 6 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 6
[All 301a Questions]

An LTM Specialist is experiencing issues in a failover event. Certain long-lasting FTP event. Certain long-lasting FTP connections using a single node pool are forced to reconnect. The bigip.conf extract is shown:

What does the LTM Specialist need to change in the configuration to avoid this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The stem mentions that it is a single server node, so there is no need to consider the factors of session maintenance. The actual requirement is to maintain the original connection status during failover. You need to configure connection mirroring to synchronize the connection status between the devices in the cluster in real time.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Malcolm
4 months ago
SNAT pool won't help in this scenario, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
4 months ago
Definitely need to check that ftp profile too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
4 months ago
Surprised this is an issue with a single node pool!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
4 months ago
I disagree, persistence mirroring might be better for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
5 months ago
Looks like connection mirroring is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
5 months ago
I feel like snatpool was mentioned in a different context, but I don't see how it relates to this failover issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the FTP profile option, but I can't recall the specifics of how it would prevent reconnections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
5 months ago
I think we had a similar practice question about FTP connections and persistence. Maybe persistence mirroring could help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
5 months ago
I remember we discussed connection mirroring in class, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not 100% clear on the differences between significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Does "ledger-type transactions" mean we can only post certain types of entries in the general journal? I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel