Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 124 Discussion

Posted by Hubert on Apr 10, 2026 at 04:27 PM

A pool with a default connection limit is configured to use Round Robin as the load balancing method. An LTM Specialist needs to ensure that the LTM device selects a server with the fewest number of connections when new clients connect. Another pool is using the same set of backend servers.

Which load balancing-method should the pool be changed to?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
20 comments · newest first
CA
Caren 2 months ago
Overall, C) Least Connections seems best for new clients. It’s efficient and easy to implement.
AR
Arminda 2 months ago
I feel like B) Weighted Least Connections (member) could work if we need to prioritize certain servers.
TE
Tess 2 months ago
True, but C) Least Connections is simpler and more straightforward for this scenario.
AM
Amie 2 months ago
But what about A) Weighted Least Connections (node)? It considers server capacity too.
EL
Elli 2 months ago
I agree, C) Least Connections makes sense. It balances the load effectively.
YA
Yan 3 months ago
I think it should be C) Least Connections. It focuses on the fewest connections.
JE
Jettie 3 months ago
I’m surprised there’s even a debate about this!
HI
Hildred 3 months ago
Totally agree with Ruthann, it’s the best option!
TE
Tennie 3 months ago
Wait, why not just use Least Connections? Seems simpler.
LA
Latrice 3 months ago
I think Weighted Least Connections (member) could work better.
RU
Ruthann 3 months ago
Should switch to Least Connections for sure.
FR
Freida 4 months ago
I’m not sure about C, seems too simple for complex setups.
SH
Sherita 4 months ago
C is the way to go, but I’m surprised it’s not more common knowledge!
EL
Elenore 4 months ago
Wait, why not B? Isn't that better for balancing?
BE
Bernardine 6 months ago
Definitely agree with C! Makes the most sense.
PA
Pamella 6 months ago
I think it should be C) Least Connections.
TR
Tracey 6 months ago
Weighted Least Connections (node) sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if that’s the best option here.
AR
Ariel 6 months ago
I feel like Least Connections is the right choice, but I can't recall if it was specifically for nodes or members.
GE
Geraldine 7 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the answer is Weighted Least Connections (member) since it considers the individual server's load.
HE
Heike 7 months ago
I think we should change it to Least Connections, but I'm not entirely sure if that applies to the node or the member.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel