Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 124 Discussion

A pool with a default connection limit is configured to use Round Robin as the load balancing method. An LTM Specialist needs to ensure that the LTM device selects a server with the fewest number of connections when new clients connect. Another pool is using the same set of backend servers.Which load balancing-method should the pool be changed to?
C) Least Connections
A) Weighted Least Connections (node]
B) Weighted Least Connections (member)
D) Least Connections

F5 Networks 301a Exam - Topic 2 Question 124 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 124
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

A pool with a default connection limit is configured to use Round Robin as the load balancing method. An LTM Specialist needs to ensure that the LTM device selects a server with the fewest number of connections when new clients connect. Another pool is using the same set of backend servers.

Which load balancing-method should the pool be changed to?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Hubert at Apr 10, 2026, 04:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Caren
5 days ago
Overall, C) Least Connections seems best for new clients. It’s efficient and easy to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
10 days ago
I feel like B) Weighted Least Connections (member) could work if we need to prioritize certain servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
16 days ago
True, but C) Least Connections is simpler and more straightforward for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
21 days ago
But what about A) Weighted Least Connections (node)? It considers server capacity too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
26 days ago
I agree, C) Least Connections makes sense. It balances the load effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
1 month ago
I think it should be C) Least Connections. It focuses on the fewest connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 month ago
I’m surprised there’s even a debate about this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
1 month ago
Totally agree with Ruthann, it’s the best option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
2 months ago
Wait, why not just use Least Connections? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 months ago
I think Weighted Least Connections (member) could work better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
2 months ago
Should switch to Least Connections for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
2 months ago
I’m not sure about C, seems too simple for complex setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
C is the way to go, but I’m surprised it’s not more common knowledge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
2 months ago
Wait, why not B? Isn't that better for balancing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
4 months ago
Definitely agree with C! Makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
4 months ago
I think it should be C) Least Connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
5 months ago
Weighted Least Connections (node) sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if that’s the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
5 months ago
I feel like Least Connections is the right choice, but I can't recall if it was specifically for nodes or members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the answer is Weighted Least Connections (member) since it considers the individual server's load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
5 months ago
I think we should change it to Least Connections, but I'm not entirely sure if that applies to the node or the member.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel