Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks Exam 101 Topic 5 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 101 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 5
[All 101 Questions]

A BIG IP Administrator wants to add a new VLAN (VLAN 40) to an LACP trunk (named LACP01) connected to the BIG-IP device Mufti VLANS exist on LACPO1. Which TMSH command should the BIG IP Administrator issue to add the new VLAN to the existing LACP trunk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Lashawna at Jul 08, 2024, 11:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marti
28 days ago
Option A looks promising, but I think it's missing the 'replace-all-with' part, which is crucial for updating the LACP01 trunk.
upvoted 0 times
Lavera
15 days ago
A) create net vlan VLAN40 (interfaces add (LACP01 {lagged)) tag 40
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alisha
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think B is the best choice because it replaces all interfaces with the tagged LACP01.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
2 months ago
Haha, Option C is definitely a trap! Untagged interfaces on an LACP trunk? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
25 days ago
Definitely, adding an untagged interface to an LACP trunk is not a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
1 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a risky choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alisha
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think B is the best choice because it replaces all interfaces with the tagged LACP01.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 months ago
I would go with Option D. It's more straightforward to just add the new VLAN 40 as an untagged interface to the existing LACP01 trunk.
upvoted 0 times
Jeffrey
4 hours ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
4 days ago
That's true, it's simpler to just add it as untagged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
18 days ago
I agree, adding VLAN 40 as an untagged interface makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
1 months ago
I think Option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
Option B seems to be the correct answer, as it allows us to replace all the existing interfaces on the LACP01 trunk with the new VLAN 40 in a tagged mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel