Customers complain that reported incidents are responded to at first but then seem to disappear after a while with the customer no longer receiving a proper follow-up.
What is the most likely cause of this?
A common operational problem occurs when incidents are initially responded to but then lose attention.
EPI identifies incomplete shift handover as a major root cause because:
Incident ownership is not transferred correctly
Pending actions are not communicated
Operators on the next shift are unaware of unresolved incidents
Follow-up obligations are lost
This leads to customers receiving initial responses but no closure or updates.
Why other options are incorrect:
A: Even without auto-emails, incidents would still be followed up internally.
B: Skill level issues affect resolution quality, not disappearance of tickets.
D: Lack of contingency causes delays, not loss of tracking.
Thus, C is correct.
EPI DCFOM-Aligned Reference Concepts (Paraphrased)
Proper shift handover is essential to maintain service continuity.
Incomplete handover leads to dropped incidents and SLA failures.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!