U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin CDCS Exam - Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

What is the main advantage of using an End-of-Row (EoR) design?
C) There will be fewer switches to manage (corrected typing: original said ''more'')
A) A single Top-of-Rack (ToR) switch is more expensive than an EoR switch
B) You need a separate rack to install all your EoR switches
D) A ToR switch has only optical interfaces

Exin CDCS Exam - Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's CDCS exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 3
[All CDCS Questions]

What is the main advantage of using an End-of-Row (EoR) design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

EoR centralizes access/aggregation switches at the end of each row, reducing the number of access switches compared with ToR (one per rack), which simplifies management and often lowers Ops costs.

A, D are incorrect generalizations.

B is a characteristic (housing EoR switches in a dedicated cabinet) but not the key advantage.


===========

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Remedios
2 months ago
Yeah, C just makes sense for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
2 months ago
I feel like C really simplifies the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 months ago
True, but managing fewer switches saves time overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
3 months ago
But what about A? ToR switches can be pricey.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
3 months ago
Agreed! Less complexity is a huge plus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
3 months ago
I think C is the best choice. Fewer switches means easier management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
3 months ago
Definitely a game changer for large data centers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
4 months ago
I thought ToR switches were more efficient though?
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
4 months ago
Wait, are EoR switches really cheaper overall?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
4 months ago
Totally agree, less complexity is always better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
4 months ago
Fewer switches to manage is a big plus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
4 months ago
Haha, who needs more switches to manage? I'll take the EoR design any day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
C) Fewer switches to manage? Sign me up! I'd rather spend my time on more important tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
5 months ago
D) A ToR switch has only optical interfaces? Wow, I didn't know that. Sounds like a real limitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
5 months ago
I thought EoR was beneficial because it centralizes management, but I might be mixing it up with other designs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
5 months ago
I feel like the cost comparison between ToR and EoR switches was mentioned in class, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about switch management, and I think EoR designs help simplify that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
I think the main advantage is about managing fewer switches, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
6 months ago
Ah, I see. The key is identifying the main advantage, not just any advantage. I think C is the strongest answer here, but I'll review my notes to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
6 months ago
The question is asking about the main advantage, so I need to focus on which option provides the biggest benefit. I'm leaning towards C, but I'll double-check the other choices just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
6 months ago
C) There will be fewer switches to manage, which means less headache for the IT team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
7 months ago
A) A single Top-of-Rack (ToR) switch is more expensive than an EoR switch? That's a no-brainer, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The options don't seem very clear to me. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
7 months ago
I think the main advantage is that there are fewer switches to manage, so that seems like the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
Joesph
2 months ago
Plus, it can save on costs in the long run!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
2 months ago
I was leaning towards that answer too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
2 months ago
Definitely! It simplifies management a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
6 months ago
I agree, fewer switches mean less hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
6 months ago
Makes sense, less equipment to monitor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel