New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin CDCS Exam - Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's CDCS exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 2
[All CDCS Questions]

What precaution shall be taken for cabling leading into an equipment rack when a data center is in a seismic-prone area?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Design changes during the implementation phase are generally allowed only when there is a strong business and/or technical justification. Changes at this stage can lead to delays, increased costs, or compromise design integrity. Thus, a rigorous assessment is required to ensure any modifications are essential and provide clear benefits or address critical issues.

Detailed Explanation:

Changes post-design freeze should be minimized to avoid scope creep and additional costs. However, if a technical issue arises that would affect operational goals, or a business need warrants modification, justified changes are permissible, following an impact assessment and approval process.

EPI Data Center Specialist References:

EPI project management guidelines recommend a controlled change management process during implementation, allowing changes only when they align with critical objectives or address unforeseen issues that affect the project's success.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Loreen
3 months ago
Tightly organized sounds better to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
3 months ago
Wait, are we really saying loose cables are safer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
3 months ago
Cables should be loose to prevent damage during quakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
3 months ago
I totally agree, flexibility is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
3 months ago
Busbar trunking? That's a new one for me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
4 months ago
I don’t recall much about busbar trunking being a standard solution for this, so D feels off to me. I’m leaning towards A as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it emphasized the importance of securing cables without restricting movement. So, A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like tightly organizing cables could actually create more issues during a quake. Maybe B is too strict?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
4 months ago
I remember something about needing to allow for movement in seismic areas, so I think A might be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
4 months ago
I think the key is to avoid any rigid or fixed cabling that could be damaged during a seismic event. Loose organization with latched connectors seems like the safest option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
5 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. Shouldn't the cables be tightly organized to the rack and trays to avoid movement? Or is that not the right approach here? I need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The cables need to be loosely organized to allow for movement, but also latched at the connectors to prevent disconnection. That's the best way to protect the equipment in a seismic-prone area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know we need to take precautions for seismic activity, but I'm not sure if tightly organizing the cables or replacing them with busbar trunking is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to allow the cables to have some flexibility to accommodate movement during a seismic event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
11 months ago
Loosely organized cables that are latched at the connectors? Sounds like a recipe for a cable management nightmare, but I guess it's better than having them rip out of the rack during an earthquake.
upvoted 0 times
Mindy
9 months ago
B) I see, safety first in a seismic-prone area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
9 months ago
A) It's a trade-off for ensuring they don't get damaged during an earthquake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
9 months ago
B) But wouldn't loosely organized cables make it harder to troubleshoot and maintain?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
A) Cables should be loosely organized to allow for movement and be latched at the connectors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Romana
11 months ago
Haha, replace them with busbar trunking? That's like replacing your car with a rocketship for the daily commute. B is the obvious choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Lashandra
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, cables need to be tightly organized in a seismic-prone area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
10 months ago
User 1: Haha, I agree! B is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
11 months ago
That's a good point, Xochitl. Safety should be the top priority in a seismic-prone area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go. Tight organization will prevent cables from becoming a hazard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
11 months ago
Definitely not C - that's just asking for trouble in a seismic-prone area! Gotta keep those cables organized and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Loose organization allows for movement during an earthquake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
11 months ago
Option A seems like the way to go. We want to allow for some movement to prevent damage during seismic activity, but also secure the connections.
upvoted 0 times
Earlean
10 months ago
User 4: Cables should definitely be latched at the connectors for safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
10 months ago
User 3: It's important to consider the seismic activity when planning cabling in data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, we need to allow for movement but also secure the connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
10 months ago
User 1: Option A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel