New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri EGMP2201 Exam - Topic 3 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EGMP2201 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 3
[All EGMP2201 Questions]

A GIS data administrator creates a replica pair to publish changes from the organization's production server to a consultant's server. Edits are being performed on the data in the consultant's replica and are overwritten as they conflict with edits applied during synchronization.

Which replication type is causing this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The issue arises because One-way, parent to child replication is being used. In this type of replication, changes from the parent replica (production server) overwrite the data in the child replica (consultant's server) during synchronization, regardless of edits made in the child replica.

1. One-way Replication Workflow

Parent to Child: Changes are pushed from the parent to the child. The child can make local edits, but these edits are not sent back to the parent, and they can be overwritten when synchronizing.

In this case, the consultant's edits are overwritten because the synchronization is unidirectional from the production server to the consultant's server.

2. Issue with Conflicting Edits

Since One-way, parent to child replication does not support bi-directional synchronization or conflict detection, local changes in the child replica are not preserved if the parent replica pushes updates that conflict with them.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Checkout/check-in:

This replication type allows edits to be made in the checkout replica and reconciled back to the parent during check-in. This ensures that conflicting edits are addressed.

One-way, child to parent:

In this replication, edits flow from the child replica to the parent replica. The issue described does not align with this setup.

Reference from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Geodatabase Replication---ArcGIS Pro Documentation

Understanding One-Way Replication

Conclusion:

The issue occurs because One-way, parent to child replication is being used, where edits made on the child replica are overwritten by updates from the parent replica during synchronization.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sanda
2 months ago
This is confusing, I didn't expect that kind of conflict!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
3 months ago
I thought both replicas could edit without overwriting?
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not the checkout/check-in method?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
3 months ago
Sounds like a one-way, parent to child issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
3 months ago
Totally agree, that's the only way it makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question before, and I think one-way, parent to child could be the answer since it suggests a direction of data flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
4 months ago
I think the checkout/check-in method might be the one that leads to conflicts, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
This sounds like a one-way replication issue, but I can't recall if it's parent to child or child to parent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
4 months ago
I remember studying about replication types, but I'm not entirely sure which one causes edits to be overwritten.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The edits on the consultant's server are being overwritten, so it must be a one-way, parent to child replication type. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. Let me re-read the question and think it through step-by-step to make sure I understand the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Based on the description, it sounds like a one-way, parent to child replication type, where the edits on the consultant's server are being overwritten. I'll select that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Is this a one-way or two-way replication issue? I'll need to review my notes on the different replication types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
5 months ago
This one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the different replication types and how they handle conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
6 months ago
I think the problem lies with A) Checkout/check-in, as it seems to be causing conflicts during synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
7 months ago
I agree with Ciara, B) One-way, parent to child, makes more sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the issue is caused by C) One-way, child to parent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
7 months ago
I think the replication type causing this issue is B) One-way, parent to child.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel