New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri EGMP2201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EGMP2201 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All EGMP2201 Questions]

All editors reconcile and post their versions daily. Other users create read-only versions for analysis purposes, so they do not reconcile and post those versions. The geodatabase administrator compresses the geodatabase nightly. For several months, performance steadily worsens.

Which action should be taken?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Scenario Overview:

Editors reconcile and post daily, but read-only versions created for analysis are not reconciled or posted.

The geodatabase is compressed nightly, but performance continues to degrade.

Cause of the Problem:

Unreconciled versions, including read-only ones, persist in the state tree, preventing the geodatabase compression from fully collapsing unused states.

Over time, this results in a bloated state tree and worsened performance.

Solution:

Reconciling and posting the read-only versions ensures that the state tree is cleared of unnecessary versions, enabling compression to collapse the database to its optimal state.

(ArcGIS Documentation: Reconcile and Post)

Alternative Options:

Option B: Creating a database view provides a read-only representation of data but does not address the underlying issue of unresolved states in the state tree.

Option C: Disabling editor tracking is unrelated to state tree performance issues and has no impact on the reconciliation or compression processes.

Therefore, reconciling the read-only versions will significantly improve performance.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Talia
2 months ago
Wait, are we really not reconciling those read-only versions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
3 months ago
Disabling editor tracking seems risky, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
3 months ago
I think creating a database view could help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
3 months ago
Performance issues for months? Sounds like something else is wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
3 months ago
Reconcile the read-only versions? That's not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
3 months ago
Disabling editor tracking sounds risky, but if it’s causing slowdowns, maybe it’s worth considering. I need to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards creating a database view, but I’m not entirely confident. It seems like it could help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where performance issues were linked to version management. I think we might need to look at the editor tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
4 months ago
I remember something about reconciling versions, but I’m not sure if read-only ones need it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
4 months ago
Based on the details provided, I think the best approach would be to go with option B and create a database view. That seems like it would help optimize the performance without needing to reconcile the read-only versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The information about the read-only versions and compression is making me unsure. I'll need to review the question again carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A, reconciling the read-only versions. That should help improve the performance issues we're seeing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key details seem to be about reconciling versions and database compression. I'm leaning towards B, creating a database view, but I'll double-check the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the details carefully to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
10 months ago
I think creating a database view could also be a good option to improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
10 months ago
I agree with Veta. Reconciling the read-only versions could help improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
10 months ago
Disable editor tracking? That's like putting a bandaid on a broken leg. We need to address the root cause here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Susana
10 months ago
We should focus on addressing the root cause of the performance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
10 months ago
C) Disable editor tracking
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
10 months ago
B) Create a database view
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
10 months ago
A) Reconcile the read-only versions
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edgar
11 months ago
Creating a database view? Sounds like a fancy way to hide the problem. Let's get our hands dirty and fix this thing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
11 months ago
I think we should reconcile the read-only versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 months ago
Reconciling the read-only versions? That's like trying to squeeze toothpaste back into the tube. Not gonna happen!
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
10 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel