Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri EGMP2201 Exam - Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Posted by Lenna on Apr 09, 2025 at 07:43 PM

All editors reconcile and post their versions daily. Other users create read-only versions for analysis purposes, so they do not reconcile and post those versions. The geodatabase administrator compresses the geodatabase nightly. For several months, performance steadily worsens.

Which action should be taken?

Suggested Answer: A

Scenario Overview:

Editors reconcile and post daily, but read-only versions created for analysis are not reconciled or posted.

The geodatabase is compressed nightly, but performance continues to degrade.

Cause of the Problem:

Unreconciled versions, including read-only ones, persist in the state tree, preventing the geodatabase compression from fully collapsing unused states.

Over time, this results in a bloated state tree and worsened performance.

Solution:

Reconciling and posting the read-only versions ensures that the state tree is cleared of unnecessary versions, enabling compression to collapse the database to its optimal state.

(ArcGIS Documentation: Reconcile and Post)

Alternative Options:

Option B: Creating a database view provides a read-only representation of data but does not address the underlying issue of unresolved states in the state tree.

Option C: Disabling editor tracking is unrelated to state tree performance issues and has no impact on the reconciliation or compression processes.

Therefore, reconciling the read-only versions will significantly improve performance.


Get Premium EGMP2201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
TA
Talia 10 months ago
Wait, are we really not reconciling those read-only versions?
OW
Owen 10 months ago
Disabling editor tracking seems risky, though.
CH
Cherelle 10 months ago
I think creating a database view could help with performance.
TO
Tony 11 months ago
Performance issues for months? Sounds like something else is wrong.
AR
Arlean 11 months ago
Reconcile the read-only versions? That's not how it works.
ME
Meghan 11 months ago
Disabling editor tracking sounds risky, but if it’s causing slowdowns, maybe it’s worth considering. I need to think this through more.
SO
Solange 11 months ago
I’m leaning towards creating a database view, but I’m not entirely confident. It seems like it could help with performance.
JE
Jeanice 12 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where performance issues were linked to version management. I think we might need to look at the editor tracking.
FR
Frederic 12 months ago
I remember something about reconciling versions, but I’m not sure if read-only ones need it.
CH
Charlesetta 12 months ago
Based on the details provided, I think the best approach would be to go with option B and create a database view. That seems like it would help optimize the performance without needing to reconcile the read-only versions.
TY
Tyra 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The information about the read-only versions and compression is making me unsure. I'll need to review the question again carefully.
FA
Fanny 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A, reconciling the read-only versions. That should help improve the performance issues we're seeing.
WA
Wade 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The key details seem to be about reconciling versions and database compression. I'm leaning towards B, creating a database view, but I'll double-check the other options.
MO
Moira 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the details carefully to figure out the best approach.
DE
Desiree 1 year ago
I think creating a database view could also be a good option to improve performance.
LO
Lonna 2 years ago
I agree with Veta. Reconciling the read-only versions could help improve performance.
MI
Micah 2 years ago
Disable editor tracking? That's like putting a bandaid on a broken leg. We need to address the root cause here, folks.
SU
Susana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Micah
We should focus on addressing the root cause of the performance issue.
TA
Tarra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Micah
C) Disable editor tracking
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Micah
B) Create a database view
ED
Edwin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Micah
A) Reconcile the read-only versions
ED
Edgar 2 years ago
Creating a database view? Sounds like a fancy way to hide the problem. Let's get our hands dirty and fix this thing!
VE
Veta 2 years ago
I think we should reconcile the read-only versions.
ER
Erick 2 years ago
Reconciling the read-only versions? That's like trying to squeeze toothpaste back into the tube. Not gonna happen!
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Erick
User 2
VI
Virgilio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Erick
User 1
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel