MENU
A GIS analyst is reviewing the work of an intern and realizes that the intern added feature attribute information directly to the attribute table. Many of the features have no geometry and do not display on the map.
The analyst uses Check Geometry to identify all features with null geometries.
Which method should the analyst use to allow adding the geometry to existing features so that they can be visualized in the map?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium EAPA_2025 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
LE
Leoma
1 month ago
I agree with A. Repair Geometry is essential for fixing those null geometries.
DE
Delfina
2 months ago
I feel like B could work too, but it seems more for reshaping than adding geometry.
NA
Nathalie
2 months ago
This question is tricky. I think option A is the best choice.
EL
Elouise
2 months ago
C doesn’t seem right, it’s about attributes, not geometry.
YU
Yun
2 months ago
Wait, how did the intern miss that? Surprising!
MA
Martina
2 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, B could work too.
GE
German
2 months ago
Totally agree, A seems like the best option!
SU
Sue
3 months ago
I think the right choice is A, Repair Geometry.
PA
Paris
3 months ago
I'm confused because I thought Repair Geometry was for fixing issues, not adding new geometry. I need to review the differences between these tools again.
BI
Billye
3 months ago
I feel like adding geometry attributes is more about enhancing existing data rather than fixing null geometries. So maybe C is the right choice?
GA
Gail
3 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think it was about modifying features directly. Could it be B, the Reshape option?
RO
Rodolfo
3 months ago
I think the answer might be A, but I'm not entirely sure if Repair Geometry is the right tool for adding geometry to features.