Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 6
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

The ArcGIS user is given data for the Arctic and is asked to perform various types of analysis using the dat

a. The data extends from the North Pole south to 70 degrees North Latitude Data layers may contain points lines, or polygons, and include ice surveys from NOAA depth contours: continental margins, locations of known and suspected oil reserves, endangered species habitat, and territorial boundaries for nations having Arctic coastline.

Which map projection should be used for the data to allow the most accurate buffering of those areas, in order to comply with the U.S court decision that ships may not approach closer than 20 nautical miles to a seal rookery?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Gearldine at Sep 13, 2024, 08:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Leslee
12 days ago
Polar stereographic, hands down. It's the projection of choice for the Arctic, and I'm not about to risk getting sued over a seal-related incident. Those guys are serious about their personal space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
15 days ago
I'm going with polar stereographic. It just makes sense for the Arctic, and I don't want to get too close to those seal rookeries. I hear the seals have a pretty good legal team!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
27 days ago
Lambert azimuthal? Sounds like a fancy French projection, but I don't know if it's the best fit for this task. Gotta love those tricky map projections!
upvoted 0 times
Cathrine
3 days ago
I agree, polar stereographic would definitely help with accurate buffering in the Arctic region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
15 days ago
I think polar stereographic would be the best choice for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettina
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe I should consult the ArcGIS user manual before making a decision. I don't want to get this wrong and end up in hot water with the court!
upvoted 0 times
Delisa
2 days ago
User 2: That sounds like a good idea. It should help us accurately buffer the areas around the seal rookery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
22 days ago
User 1: I think we should use the polar stereographic projection for the data analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shoshana
2 months ago
Polar stereographic is the way to go! It's designed specifically for the Arctic region and will give us the most accurate buffering results.
upvoted 0 times
Christa
12 days ago
User 4: Lambert azimuthal might be a good option too, but polar stereographic seems like the most accurate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
19 days ago
User 3: I think gnomonic could also work well for this type of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
27 days ago
User 2: Definitely, it's specifically designed for that region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, polar stereographic is the best choice for accurate buffering in the Arctic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyssa
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but gnomonic projection could also work well for this type of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I agree with Antonio, polar stereographic projection would be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I think we should use polar stereographic projection for accurate buffering.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel