Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 60 Discussion

A taster contains pixels with decimal values.Which method is used to round raster pixel values to the nearest whole number?
A) use the Round Up tool (Spatial Analyst), then the Round Down tool (Spatial Analyst)
B) use the Round Down tool (Spatial Analyst), then the Round Up tool (Spatial Analyst)
C) use the Plus tool (Spatial Analyst) to add 1. then the Minus tool (Spatial Analyst) to subtract 0.5
D) use the Plus tool (Spatial Analyst) to add 0.5, then the int tool (Spatial Analyst) to truncate to the nearest integer

Esri EADP19-001 Exam - Topic 3 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 3
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

A taster contains pixels with decimal values.

Which method is used to round raster pixel values to the nearest whole number?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Carlene at Nov 14, 2024, 02:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kiley
9 months ago
I agree with D, it's the most straightforward approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
10 months ago
No way it's C, that method seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
10 months ago
Wait, is there really a Plus tool? Sounds weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
10 months ago
I thought it was A at first, but D makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
10 months ago
Definitely D, that's how rounding works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D because adding 0.5 and then truncating seems like a common way to round numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
11 months ago
I remember the Round Up and Round Down tools being mentioned, but I can't recall which order to use them in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the Plus tool is definitely involved, but I'm not sure about the truncation part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
I think the method involves adding something to the pixel values, but I can't remember if it's 0.5 or 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
11 months ago
I'm not too familiar with the Spatial Analyst tools, so I'm not 100% sure about the best approach here. I'll need to review the tool descriptions to make sure I select the right method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to use the Spatial Analyst tools to round the decimal values to the nearest whole number. D looks like the right approach - add 0.5 and then truncate to the nearest integer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if I fully understand the difference between the rounding methods mentioned. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
This seems straightforward, I think the answer is D - using the Plus tool to add 0.5 and then the int tool to truncate to the nearest integer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 year ago
I heard they're making a new GIS tool called the 'Round and About' tool. It's perfect for when you just can't make up your mind about rounding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
1 year ago
Option D for sure! Who needs all those extra steps when you can just add 0.5 and truncate? Easy peasy lemon squeezy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm tempted to go with option C, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient way to round the pixel values. Gonna have to think this one through.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnda
1 year ago
User1: Let's weigh the options carefully before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 year ago
User3: I'm not sure either, but option C seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 year ago
User2: Really? I was leaning towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
1 year ago
User1: I think option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josphine
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure I've used the Round Up and Round Down tools before, but this question is making me second-guess myself. Maybe I should review the Spatial Analyst tools again.
upvoted 0 times
Yong
1 year ago
A: Oh, really? I'll have to double-check my notes on the Spatial Analyst tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
1 year ago
B: No, I remember using the Round Up tool first, then the Round Down tool to round raster pixel values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 year ago
A: I think the answer is D) use the Plus tool to add 0.5, then the int tool to truncate to the nearest integer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tambra
1 year ago
Option D looks like the way to go. Adding 0.5 and then using the int tool to truncate to the nearest integer seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Cammy
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, that method seems like the most straightforward way to round raster pixel values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, adding 0.5 and then truncating to the nearest integer seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamar
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think I would go with method D as well. It seems like the most logical way to round decimal pixel values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
1 year ago
I agree with Sheron, method D makes sense because adding 0.5 and then truncating will round the pixel values to the nearest whole number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 year ago
I think the correct method is D) use the Plus tool to add 0.5, then the int tool to truncate to the nearest integer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel