Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ericsson Exam ECP-206 Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Ericsson's ECP-206 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All ECP-206 Questions]

Which two statements are true about route summarization? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A network operator who wants to make sure voice data is prioritized should assign it to Ethernet traffic class 6. Ethernet traffic class is a term used to refer to the priority code point (PCP) field in the VLAN header of an Ethernet frame. The PCP field is a 3-bit field that can encode up to eight different priority levels, ranging from 0 (lowest) to 7 (highest). The PCP values can be mapped to different types of traffic according to their QoS requirements. The recommended mapping is as follows :

PCP 0: Best effort (default)

PCP 1: Background

PCP 2: Spare

PCP 3: Excellent effort

PCP 4: Controlled load

PCP 5: Video

PCP 6: Voice

PCP 7: Network control

Voice data is a type of real-time traffic that requires the highest priority and lowest delay in the network. Therefore, it should be assigned to PCP 6, which corresponds to Ethernet traffic class 6 .


Contribute your Thoughts:

Anglea
1 months ago
Wow, I'm glad I read the question carefully. A and B are the only true statements about route summarization. The other options are just silly.
upvoted 0 times
Trina
5 days ago
Route summarization definitely helps reduce the size of routing tables and signaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
6 days ago
It's important to pay attention to the details in questions like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
27 days ago
I agree, A and B are the correct options for route summarization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
Haha, I almost selected D. Improving the best route calculation? That's like saying route summarization makes the router smarter. A and B are the correct answers here.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
4 days ago
User3: A and B make sense, it's all about reducing size and signaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
10 days ago
User2: Yeah, route summarization doesn't actually make the router smarter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
16 days ago
User1: I almost picked D too, but A and B are the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
2 months ago
I agree with A and B, but C is not quite right. Route summarization summarizes multiple routes into a single, more concise entry, not a default route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
A and B are definitely true. Route summarization reduces the size of the routing table and the amount of signaling required, making the network more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Shannon
1 months ago
B) It reduces signaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 months ago
A) It reduces the size of a routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andra
2 months ago
I think route summarization is important for network efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
2 months ago
C) It summaries the routing table entries into a default route.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
2 months ago
A) It reduces the size of a routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
a