Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council ECSAv10 Exam - Topic 7 Question 70 Discussion

Posted by Detra on May 17, 2024 at 05:26 AM

SQL injection attack consists of insertion or "injection" of either a partial or complete SQL query via the data input or transmitted from the client (browser) to the web application. A successful SQL injection attack can:

i) Read sensitive data from the database

iii) Modify database data (insert/update/delete)

iii) Execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS) iV) Recover the content of a given file existing on the DBMS file system or write files into the file system v) Issue commands to the operating system

Pen tester needs to perform various tests to detect SQL injection vulnerability. He has to make a list of all input fields whose values could be used in crafting a SQL query, including the hidden fields of POST requests and then test them separately, trying to interfere with the query and to generate an error.

In which of the following tests is the source code of the application tested in a non-runtime environment to detect the SQL injection vulnerabilities?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium ECSAv10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
CA
Casie 11 months ago
Just a reminder, always sanitize your inputs!
LO
Long 11 months ago
Wait, static testing? That sounds too easy!
LI
Ligia 11 months ago
I thought dynamic testing was the way to go for this?
OL
Ollie 12 months ago
Totally agree, it's a major security risk!
HO
Hobert 12 months ago
SQL injection can really mess up a database!
MU
Murray 1 year ago
I definitely recall that Static Testing is used for checking the source code for vulnerabilities, so I would go with option D.
AN
Angelo 1 year ago
I feel a bit confused here. Dynamic Testing seems like it could also relate to SQL injections, but I know that’s runtime.
MU
Murray 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about SQL injection tests, and I think Static Testing is the right answer since it involves analyzing the source code.
IS
Isaiah 1 year ago
I remember studying the different types of testing, but I'm not entirely sure which one is non-runtime. I think it might be Static Testing?
RA
Raelene 1 year ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is talking about SQL injection attacks, but then it's asking about a specific testing method. I'll need to think through the different types of testing and how they relate to identifying SQL injection vulnerabilities.
CR
Cristen 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is clearly asking about the testing method that involves examining the source code, and that would be static testing. The other options, like automated testing and dynamic testing, don't seem to fit the description as well.
SA
Sang 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking about the type of testing where the source code is analyzed in a non-runtime environment to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities. Based on the options provided, that sounds like it would be static testing.
AL
Alex 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's talking about SQL injection attacks and the different types of damage they can cause, but then it's asking about a specific type of testing. I'll need to carefully read through the details to make sure I understand the connection.
RO
Rosalind 1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the different types of testing mentioned and determine which one involves analyzing the source code in a non-runtime environment.
AH
Ahmed 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward - I think I'd go with option A and use the 'Account Send Summary' report in Email Studio to get the weekly email metrics.
PE
Penney 1 year ago
Standardizing the firmware and code levels across the SAN components seems like a smart move to avoid future problems. I'll make sure to test that thoroughly before implementing.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
I think the Customer Success Manager is usually involved in these updates, but I'm not entirely sure if they are the most accountable.
VI
Vilma 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The bank confirmed the letter of credit after determining the documents were in order. So the question is whether that counts as "participation" in the boycott, even though the bank wasn't the one imposing the boycott requirement.
CH
Charisse 1 year ago
D) Static Testing, for sure. Although, I have to say, the list of things a successful SQL injection attack can do is quite impressive. It's like a one-stop shop for causing all kinds of mayhem!
SE
Sean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charisse
Definitely, staying vigilant and conducting thorough testing is key to preventing such attacks.
YE
Yen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charisse
I agree, SQL injection attacks can be very dangerous. It's crucial to be aware of the potential risks.
LO
Lonny 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charisse
Static Testing is the correct answer. It's important to check the source code for vulnerabilities.
DO
Dominque 2 years ago
I'll have to go with D) Static Testing. It's the only option that matches the description in the question. Although, I do wonder if the person who wrote this question has ever actually tried to manually test for SQL injection vulnerabilities. Talk about a tedious task!
HY
Hyun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
D: It's the most thorough method for sure.
LA
Lachelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
C: Static Testing is definitely the way to go for detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
B: Yeah, I agree. It's all about testing the source code in a non-runtime environment.
ON
Oneida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominque
A: I think D) Static Testing is the right choice.
BE
Bernardo 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn between A) Automated Testing and D) Static Testing. Both of those seem relevant, but I'm leaning towards D since the question specifically mentions testing the source code in a non-runtime environment.
DE
Delmy 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C) Dynamic Testing. We're talking about detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities, and dynamic testing involves testing the application in a runtime environment, which seems more appropriate for this kind of task.
TY
Tyisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Delmy
User 2
JE
Jennie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Delmy
User 1
SE
Selma 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D) Static Testing. The question states that the source code of the application is tested in a non-runtime environment, which is the definition of static testing.
JE
Jeanice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Selma
Automated Testing and Dynamic Testing are also important, but Static Testing focuses on the source code specifically.
LI
Lisbeth 1 year ago
↳ replying to Selma
Static Testing is essential to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities before the application is executed.
WI
Wilbert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Selma
Yes, you are right. Static Testing involves testing the source code in a non-runtime environment.
JI
Jin 2 years ago
↳ replying to Selma
I think the correct answer is D) Static Testing.
TE
Tesha 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think static testing is the best option to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities before runtime.
TR
Troy 2 years ago
I agree with Candida, because static testing involves analyzing the source code without executing it.
CA
Candida 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Static Testing.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel