Eccouncil ECSAv10 Exam - Topic 7 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's ECSAv10 exam

Question #: 70
Topic #: 7

SQL injection attack consists of insertion or "injection" of either a partial or complete SQL query via the data input or transmitted from the client (browser) to the web application. A successful SQL injection attack can:

i) Read sensitive data from the database

iii) Modify database data (insert/update/delete)

iii) Execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS) iV) Recover the content of a given file existing on the DBMS file system or write files into the file system v) Issue commands to the operating system

Pen tester needs to perform various tests to detect SQL injection vulnerability. He has to make a list of all input fields whose values could be used in crafting a SQL query, including the hidden fields of POST requests and then test them separately, trying to interfere with the query and to generate an error.

In which of the following tests is the source code of the application tested in a non-runtime environment to detect the SQL injection vulnerabilities?

AAutomated Testing

BFunction Testing

CDynamic Testing

DStatic Testing

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Detra at May 17, 2024, 05:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ECSAv10 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Casie

3 months ago

Just a reminder, always sanitize your inputs!

upvoted 0 times

...

Long

3 months ago

Wait, static testing? That sounds too easy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

3 months ago

I thought dynamic testing was the way to go for this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ollie

4 months ago

Totally agree, it's a major security risk!

upvoted 0 times

...

Hobert

4 months ago

SQL injection can really mess up a database!

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

4 months ago

I definitely recall that Static Testing is used for checking the source code for vulnerabilities, so I would go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Angelo

4 months ago

I feel a bit confused here. Dynamic Testing seems like it could also relate to SQL injections, but I know that’s runtime.

upvoted 0 times

...

Murray

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question about SQL injection tests, and I think Static Testing is the right answer since it involves analyzing the source code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaiah

5 months ago

I remember studying the different types of testing, but I'm not entirely sure which one is non-runtime. I think it might be Static Testing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

5 months ago

I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is talking about SQL injection attacks, but then it's asking about a specific testing method. I'll need to think through the different types of testing and how they relate to identifying SQL injection vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristen

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is clearly asking about the testing method that involves examining the source code, and that would be static testing. The other options, like automated testing and dynamic testing, don't seem to fit the description as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking about the type of testing where the source code is analyzed in a non-runtime environment to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities. Based on the options provided, that sounds like it would be static testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's talking about SQL injection attacks and the different types of damage they can cause, but then it's asking about a specific type of testing. I'll need to carefully read through the details to make sure I understand the connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalind

5 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the different types of testing mentioned and determine which one involves analyzing the source code in a non-runtime environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

5 months ago

This seems pretty straightforward - I think I'd go with option A and use the 'Account Send Summary' report in Email Studio to get the weekly email metrics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Penney

5 months ago

Standardizing the firmware and code levels across the SAN components seems like a smart move to avoid future problems. I'll make sure to test that thoroughly before implementing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

5 months ago

I think the Customer Success Manager is usually involved in these updates, but I'm not entirely sure if they are the most accountable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The bank confirmed the letter of credit after determining the documents were in order. So the question is whether that counts as "participation" in the boycott, even though the bank wasn't the one imposing the boycott requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charisse

10 months ago

D) Static Testing, for sure. Although, I have to say, the list of things a successful SQL injection attack can do is quite impressive. It's like a one-stop shop for causing all kinds of mayhem!

upvoted 0 times

Sean

8 months ago

Definitely, staying vigilant and conducting thorough testing is key to preventing such attacks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yen

9 months ago

I agree, SQL injection attacks can be very dangerous. It's crucial to be aware of the potential risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

9 months ago

Static Testing is the correct answer. It's important to check the source code for vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

10 months ago

I'll have to go with D) Static Testing. It's the only option that matches the description in the question. Although, I do wonder if the person who wrote this question has ever actually tried to manually test for SQL injection vulnerabilities. Talk about a tedious task!

upvoted 0 times

Hyun

8 months ago

D: It's the most thorough method for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lachelle

9 months ago

C: Static Testing is definitely the way to go for detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

10 months ago

B: Yeah, I agree. It's all about testing the source code in a non-runtime environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oneida

10 months ago

A: I think D) Static Testing is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit torn between A) Automated Testing and D) Static Testing. Both of those seem relevant, but I'm leaning towards D since the question specifically mentions testing the source code in a non-runtime environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delmy

10 months ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is C) Dynamic Testing. We're talking about detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities, and dynamic testing involves testing the application in a runtime environment, which seems more appropriate for this kind of task.

upvoted 0 times

Tyisha

9 months ago

User 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennie

9 months ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

11 months ago

I think the correct answer is D) Static Testing. The question states that the source code of the application is tested in a non-runtime environment, which is the definition of static testing.

upvoted 0 times