I'm a fan of option D. After all, what's the point of having a security program if the business leadership isn't fully on board? It's like trying to herd cats without a shiny CISO badge.
Option A sounds like a good way to get people to fall asleep during security training. Let's go with option B - security consortiums are where it's at! Plus, it has the word 'consortium' which makes it sound fancy and important.
Having a strong CISO role with executive-level representation is key, in my opinion. That way, security can be elevated to the highest levels of the organization and truly integrated with business priorities.
I think option C is the way to go. Ensuring business unit testing and validation of security implementations is crucial for meeting their needs. The other options are good, but this one seems the most direct.
A comprehensive security awareness program is a great start, but it doesn't address the core issue of aligning security to business needs. I'd go with option B - creating security consortiums with business unit participation.
Having strong executive-level security representation can also be crucial in ensuring that security initiatives are in line with the overall business strategy.
Rikki
26 days agoShanda
27 days agoLenna
28 days agoGlendora
16 days agoShala
1 months agoMaricela
17 hours agoDorthy
14 days agoWilda
2 months agoElmer
23 days agoPaz
1 months agoElli
1 months agoRaina
1 months agoMartin
1 months agoEvette
1 months agoFarrah
2 months agoArthur
2 months agoHillary
2 months ago