Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 512-50 Exam - Topic 5 Question 41 Discussion

The remediation of a specific audit finding is deemed too expensive and will not be implemented. Which of the following is a TRUE statement?
D) The remediation costs are irrelevant; it must be implemented regardless of cost.
A) The asset is more expensive than the remediation
B) The audit finding is incorrect
C) The asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs

Eccouncil 512-50 Exam - Topic 5 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 512-50 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 5
[All 512-50 Questions]

The remediation of a specific audit finding is deemed too expensive and will not be implemented. Which of the following is a TRUE statement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Cordell at Apr 24, 2024, 12:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 512-50 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Theron
8 months ago
A could be true too, depends on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
8 months ago
D is a bit extreme, costs do matter!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
8 months ago
Wait, is it really that straightforward? What if the asset has hidden value?
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
8 months ago
Totally agree with C! Why spend more than the asset's value?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
8 months ago
C makes sense, the asset isn't worth the cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
9 months ago
I vaguely recall something about valuing assets versus remediation costs, so C might be the right choice, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
9 months ago
I feel like option D is a bit extreme. I thought we learned that cost considerations are important in decision-making for remediation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we practiced a question where the audit finding was deemed incorrect if remediation wasn't done. Could that relate to option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
9 months ago
I remember discussing how sometimes the cost of remediation can outweigh the value of the asset itself. So, maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
9 months ago
I've got a good strategy for these types of questions. I'll eliminate the options that don't make sense, then choose the one that best fits the information given. I think C is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question is asking about a "true statement," but all the options seem plausible. I'll have to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. If the remediation is deemed too expensive, then the asset must be less valuable than the cost to fix it. So I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
9 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is C - the asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
9 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll go with the options that allow me to optimize the mobile experience while still keeping the laptop users in mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
10 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to identify the right VMware technologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
I feel like I saw a practice question that was really similar to this one. I think B might be correct because it talks about making decisions for proper treatment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
10 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. Databases can come in so many different forms, from relational to NoSQL to object-oriented. I'll need to really consider the core characteristics that span across all of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks straightforward. I think the key is to use the SET keyword in the UPDATE statement to change the product name.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
10 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one, I'll have to review my notes on Meraki Insight before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 year ago
B seems like the easy way out. If the audit finding is incorrect, then there's no need to worry about remediation at all. Maybe they should double-check their work, just to be sure. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A. If the asset is more expensive than the remediation, then it's a no-brainer to just go with the fix. Though, that would be one expensive asset, huh? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Leah
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, I see your point. It's all about cost-effectiveness in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
1 year ago
User 2: I agree with you, Gilbert. It wouldn't make sense to spend more on fixing something that costs less.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 year ago
User 1: I think C is the correct statement. The asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
D all the way! Audit findings must be addressed, no matter the cost. It's the principle of the thing, you can't just ignore them because it's too expensive. What are they even thinking?
upvoted 0 times
Jean
1 year ago
D) The remediation costs are irrelevant; it must be implemented regardless of cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
1 year ago
C) The asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
1 year ago
A) The asset is more expensive than the remediation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option C makes the most sense. If the asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs, then it's not worth the investment. Gotta weigh the pros and cons, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Melda
1 year ago
But what if the audit finding is actually incorrect? Wouldn't that change things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
1 year ago
I agree, it's all about cost-benefit analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
But what if the asset being protected is really valuable? Wouldn't it make sense to implement the remediation despite the cost?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel