Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 512-50 Topic 5 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 512-50 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 5
[All 512-50 Questions]

The remediation of a specific audit finding is deemed too expensive and will not be implemented. Which of the following is a TRUE statement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Staci
2 months ago
B seems like the easy way out. If the audit finding is incorrect, then there's no need to worry about remediation at all. Maybe they should double-check their work, just to be sure. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards A. If the asset is more expensive than the remediation, then it's a no-brainer to just go with the fix. Though, that would be one expensive asset, huh? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Leah
22 days ago
User 3: Yeah, I see your point. It's all about cost-effectiveness in the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
23 days ago
User 2: I agree with you, Gilbert. It wouldn't make sense to spend more on fixing something that costs less.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 months ago
User 1: I think C is the correct statement. The asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashawnda
2 months ago
D all the way! Audit findings must be addressed, no matter the cost. It's the principle of the thing, you can't just ignore them because it's too expensive. What are they even thinking?
upvoted 0 times
Jean
1 months ago
D) The remediation costs are irrelevant; it must be implemented regardless of cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
1 months ago
C) The asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
2 months ago
A) The asset is more expensive than the remediation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
3 months ago
Hmm, I think option C makes the most sense. If the asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs, then it's not worth the investment. Gotta weigh the pros and cons, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Melda
3 months ago
But what if the audit finding is actually incorrect? Wouldn't that change things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
3 months ago
I agree, it's all about cost-benefit analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
3 months ago
But what if the asset being protected is really valuable? Wouldn't it make sense to implement the remediation despite the cost?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel