I'm leaning towards A. If the asset is more expensive than the remediation, then it's a no-brainer to just go with the fix. Though, that would be one expensive asset, huh? *chuckles*
D all the way! Audit findings must be addressed, no matter the cost. It's the principle of the thing, you can't just ignore them because it's too expensive. What are they even thinking?
Hmm, I think option C makes the most sense. If the asset being protected is less valuable than the remediation costs, then it's not worth the investment. Gotta weigh the pros and cons, you know?
Aleisha
12 hours agoLashawnda
7 days agoAbel
27 days agoMelda
13 days agoCharlena
15 days agoSylvia
1 months agoFrederick
1 months agoSylvia
1 months ago