New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil 312-76 Exam - Topic 16 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-76 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 16
[All 312-76 Questions]

Which of the following techniques is an encryption method that uses public-key encryption to encrypt and digitally sign e-mail messages during communication between e-mail clients?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elenora
4 months ago
Really? I didn't know PGP could sign emails too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
4 months ago
Wait, so PGP is the only one that does both?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
4 months ago
I thought AES was for encryption too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
4 months ago
Totally agree, PGP is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
5 months ago
It's definitely PGP!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
AES seems more like a symmetric encryption method, so I don't think it's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
5 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question like this before, and it was definitely about PGP being used for email encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about public-key encryption being a key feature of PGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
5 months ago
I think PGP is the right answer because we discussed it in class as a method for securing emails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about the sequence Oracle uses to search for the keystore and its location. I'll carefully review the options and think through the steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
Option A looks like the best solution to me. Being able to make the configuration selections on the sales order and have the production order automatically generated with the correct parts is exactly what we need. I'm confident that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't modifying the SOA record in the DNS domain registrar be the right approach? That's what option B suggests, and it seems like it would make the records resolvable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's B - you want to assess AML risks before launching anything new, not after.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
Honestly, 'vicarious' sounds like the technical legal term for when one party is responsible for another's actions - that's probably what they mean.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel