New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil 312-49 Exam - Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 1
[All 312-49 Questions]

You work as an IT security auditor hired by a law firm in Boston to test whether you can gain access to sensitive information about the company clients. You have rummaged through their trash and found very little information. You do not want to set off any alarms on their network, so you plan on performing passive foot printing against their Web servers. What tool should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hubert
3 months ago
Really? I thought passive foot printing was more about tools like Netcraft.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
3 months ago
Wait, why not just use Nmap? Seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
4 months ago
Dig is great for DNS queries, but not really for foot printing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
Netcraft is a solid choice too, especially for passive info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
I’d go with Nmap for sure. It’s super reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
4 months ago
I recall Dig being useful for DNS queries, but I’m not confident if it’s the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards using Nmap, but I feel like it might be too aggressive for passive scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
5 months ago
I think Netcraft is a good option for passive information gathering, especially for web servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
5 months ago
I remember we discussed passive footprinting in class, but I’m not entirely sure which tool is best for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is that we need to use the firewall logs to identify unmanaged external applications and the users accessing them. Cloud App Discovery sounds like the right tool for that job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the difference between "verified" and "validated." I'll have to review my notes on requirements management to make sure I select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
5 months ago
This is a good one. I'm pretty confident I know the solution, but I'll double-check the details to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the default spanning-tree mode on Arista switches is RPVST, but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
9 months ago
I'm just picturing the auditor rummaging through the trash and finding a juicy client list. Someone's getting fired!
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
8 months ago
C) Netcraft
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
8 months ago
B) Nmap
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
8 months ago
D) Dig
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
9 months ago
A) Ping sweep
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
9 months ago
C) Netcraft
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
9 months ago
B) Nmap
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
9 months ago
A) Ping sweep
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paola
10 months ago
Haha, a ping sweep? Really? That's like the most basic and noisy way to do reconnaissance. Definitely not the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
9 months ago
User 3: Netcraft might also be a good option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
9 months ago
User 2: Nmap would be a better choice than a ping sweep.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
10 months ago
User 1: What tool should we use for passive foot printing against their Web servers?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Scot
10 months ago
I'm going with Dig. It's a simple yet effective tool for passive DNS reconnaissance, which could be really useful in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Ryann
8 months ago
User 4: Let's weigh the pros and cons of each tool before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
8 months ago
User 3: I see your point, but I still think Dig is the best option for passive DNS reconnaissance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
8 months ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe Netcraft would provide more valuable information without setting off any alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
8 months ago
User 1: I think Nmap would be a better choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
9 months ago
User 4: Let's weigh the pros and cons of each tool before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
9 months ago
User 3: I see your point, but I still think Dig is the best option for passive DNS reconnaissance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
9 months ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe Netcraft would provide more valuable information without setting off any alarms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
9 months ago
User 1: I think Nmap would be a better choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andra
10 months ago
Nmap seems like the obvious choice. It's a powerful tool for network scanning and can give you a lot of valuable information about the target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Netcraft could also be a good option for passive foot printing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
10 months ago
I agree with Helaine, Nmap is a great tool for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
10 months ago
I think we should use Nmap for passive foot printing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
11 months ago
I think Netcraft is the way to go here. It's a passive tool that can gather a ton of information about the target website without being intrusive.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's important to gather information without alerting the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
10 months ago
User 1: I agree, Netcraft is a good choice for passive foot printing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Netcraft could also be a good option for passive foot printing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
11 months ago
I agree with Cornell, Nmap is a great tool for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
11 months ago
I think we should use Nmap for passive foot printing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel