Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council 312-49 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Posted by Timothy on Aug 18, 2022 at 08:41 PM

Jacob is a computer forensics investigator with over 10 years of experience in investigations and has written over 50 articles on computer forensics. He has been called upon as a qualified witness to testify the accuracy and integrity of the technical log files gathered in an investigation into computer fraud. What is the term used for Jacob's testimony in this case?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium 312-49 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
CH
Chery 11 months ago
Really? I thought it was Justification.
PR
Precious 11 months ago
I've seen this before, it's definitely Authentication.
DO
Doretha 12 months ago
Wait, isn't it more about Certification?
TI
Tijuana 12 months ago
Totally agree, it's all about verifying the evidence!
AL
Aleshia 1 year ago
Jacob's testimony is called Authentication.
ER
Erick 1 year ago
I recall that certification is more about credentials, so I’m leaning towards authentication as the correct term here.
OT
Otis 1 year ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought it could also be justification, but that doesn’t seem right in this context.
AZ
Azalee 1 year ago
I think it might be authentication since it relates to verifying the integrity of the evidence. That sounds familiar from a practice question we did.
WA
Wai 1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of expert testimony in class, but I'm not sure if it's called authentication or something else.
MI
Misty 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We have the annual usage, order cost, unit cost, and carrying cost. I think we need to use the economic order quantity formula to solve this.
LA
Lashawn 1 year ago
I think the key here is that the organization is new to formal reviews. Even though the pilot project was successful, they may need to focus on getting buy-in and support from the broader organization, not just the participants. The missing factor could be about communication and change management.
ED
Edelmira 1 year ago
I think message-filter order is important, but I'm not sure what the second factor should be. Maybe it's related to the structure of the combined packet?
JA
Jamie 1 year ago
Okay, I've got an idea on how to approach this. Since the user can only transact in 3 of the 5 Operating Units assigned to their profile, I think the solution is to set the values for the MO: Default Operating Units profile option at the user level. That should limit the list of values to just those 3 units.
RH
Rhea 1 year ago
I might be mixing this up, but I think aggregate supply could refer to full employment output—perhaps option B?
JO
Joseph 1 year ago
I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!
JA
Janine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!
MI
Millie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
D) Authentication
HY
Hyman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
A) Certification
GE
German 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
D) Authentication
TI
Timmy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!
JA
Jani 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
D) Authentication
RO
Rosendo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
A) Certification
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joseph
A) Certification
MA
Mauricio 2 years ago
You know, I was tempted to choose C) Reiteration, because Jacob has written so many articles on the topic. But I suppose that's more about repetition, not validation. Authentication it is!
AR
Ariel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mauricio
Certification wouldn't really fit in this case, so Authentication makes more sense.
ME
Mendy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mauricio
I agree, Authentication is the correct term for Jacob's testimony.
ER
Erasmo 2 years ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards B) Justification, but I guess that's more about providing a rationale for the investigation itself, not the evidence. Authentication makes the most sense here.
DE
Denny 2 years ago
Yes, Authentication makes sense because Jacob is confirming the integrity of the evidence.
AP
Apolonia 2 years ago
I agree with Gilma, Jacob's testimony is about verifying the accuracy of the technical log files.
GI
Gilma 2 years ago
I think the term is Authentication.
RO
Ronnie 2 years ago
I agree with Carolann. Jacob's expertise and experience make his testimony an authoritative source for validating the evidence. This is the very definition of authentication.
NO
Noe 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
Absolutely, Jacob's testimony will help establish the accuracy of the technical log files.
YA
Yan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
Authentication is crucial in cases like this to ensure the integrity of the evidence.
LA
Lai 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
Yes, I agree. Jacob's experience and expertise make his testimony very reliable.
LA
Laurel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ronnie
I think the term for Jacob's testimony is Authentication.
CA
Carolann 2 years ago
Clearly, the correct answer is D) Authentication. Jacob's testimony is crucial in verifying the accuracy and integrity of the technical log files, which is the essence of authentication in computer forensics.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel