Eccouncil 312-49 Exam - Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 1

Jacob is a computer forensics investigator with over 10 years of experience in investigations and has written over 50 articles on computer forensics. He has been called upon as a qualified witness to testify the accuracy and integrity of the technical log files gathered in an investigation into computer fraud. What is the term used for Jacob's testimony in this case?

ACertification

BJustification

CReiteration

DAuthentication

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Timothy at Aug 18, 2022, 08:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-49 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Chery

10 months ago

Really? I thought it was Justification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Precious

10 months ago

I've seen this before, it's definitely Authentication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

10 months ago

Wait, isn't it more about Certification?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

10 months ago

Totally agree, it's all about verifying the evidence!

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleshia

11 months ago

Jacob's testimony is called Authentication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

11 months ago

I recall that certification is more about credentials, so I’m leaning towards authentication as the correct term here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Otis

11 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought it could also be justification, but that doesn’t seem right in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

11 months ago

I think it might be authentication since it relates to verifying the integrity of the evidence. That sounds familiar from a practice question we did.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wai

11 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of expert testimony in class, but I'm not sure if it's called authentication or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Misty

11 months ago

Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We have the annual usage, order cost, unit cost, and carrying cost. I think we need to use the economic order quantity formula to solve this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

11 months ago

I think the key here is that the organization is new to formal reviews. Even though the pilot project was successful, they may need to focus on getting buy-in and support from the broader organization, not just the participants. The missing factor could be about communication and change management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edelmira

11 months ago

I think message-filter order is important, but I'm not sure what the second factor should be. Maybe it's related to the structure of the combined packet?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamie

11 months ago

Okay, I've got an idea on how to approach this. Since the user can only transact in 3 of the 5 Operating Units assigned to their profile, I think the solution is to set the values for the MO: Default Operating Units profile option at the user level. That should limit the list of values to just those 3 units.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

11 months ago

I might be mixing this up, but I think aggregate supply could refer to full employment output—perhaps option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

1 year ago

I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!

upvoted 0 times

Janine

1 year ago

I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!

upvoted 0 times

...

Millie

1 year ago

D) Authentication

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

1 year ago

A) Certification

upvoted 0 times

...

German

1 year ago

D) Authentication

upvoted 0 times

...

Timmy

1 year ago

I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jani

1 year ago

D) Authentication

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

1 year ago

A) Certification

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephen

1 year ago

A) Certification

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

1 year ago

You know, I was tempted to choose C) Reiteration, because Jacob has written so many articles on the topic. But I suppose that's more about repetition, not validation. Authentication it is!

upvoted 0 times

Ariel

1 year ago

Certification wouldn't really fit in this case, so Authentication makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mendy

1 year ago

I agree, Authentication is the correct term for Jacob's testimony.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

1 year ago

Hmm, I was leaning towards B) Justification, but I guess that's more about providing a rationale for the investigation itself, not the evidence. Authentication makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

1 year ago

Yes, Authentication makes sense because Jacob is confirming the integrity of the evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Apolonia

1 year ago

I agree with Gilma, Jacob's testimony is about verifying the accuracy of the technical log files.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilma

1 year ago

I think the term is Authentication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

1 year ago

I agree with Carolann. Jacob's expertise and experience make his testimony an authoritative source for validating the evidence. This is the very definition of authentication.

upvoted 0 times

Noe

1 year ago

Absolutely, Jacob's testimony will help establish the accuracy of the technical log files.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

1 year ago

Authentication is crucial in cases like this to ensure the integrity of the evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

1 year ago

Yes, I agree. Jacob's experience and expertise make his testimony very reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

1 year ago

I think the term for Jacob's testimony is Authentication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carolann

1 year ago

Clearly, the correct answer is D) Authentication. Jacob's testimony is crucial in verifying the accuracy and integrity of the technical log files, which is the essence of authentication in computer forensics.

upvoted 0 times

...