Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil 312-39 Exam - Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-39 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 7
[All 312-39 Questions]

A type of threat intelligent that find out the information about the attacker by misleading them is known as

.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Hermila at May 08, 2022, 03:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-39 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Zona
7 months ago
Counter Intelligence makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
7 months ago
I've seen it referred to as Detection Threat Intelligence too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
8 months ago
Totally agree, that's the right term!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
8 months ago
I think it's D, Counter Intelligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
8 months ago
I thought we covered this in our readings, and I lean towards D as well. It just makes sense in the context of misleading attackers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
8 months ago
I feel like I read about this concept, but I'm confused between Counter Intelligence and Operational Intelligence. They both seem relevant!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
I remember discussing something similar in class, but I can't recall if it was specifically about misleading attackers. Maybe it's B, Detection Threat Intelligence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
8 months ago
I think the answer might be D, Counter Intelligence, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from our last practice session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the details of HyperMetro's static priority arbitration mode before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the details provided, it seems like Kelvin may have violated the terms of his employment agreement by sharing client data with a competitor. That could result in a fine, but I'm not sure about the maximum amount. I'll need to double-check the specifics in the ordinance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
8 months ago
Okay, let me see here. The code is trying to find a specific `pair` in the `map`, but I'm not sure if that's the right way to use `find()`. I might need to double-check the documentation on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 months ago
I vaguely recall something about geo-replicated storage negating the need for snapshots. Option D seems a bit off to me, though; should we still be doing backups regardless?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel