Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

EC-Council 312-39 Exam - Topic 2 Question 66 Discussion

Posted by Karan on Mar 23, 2023 at 06:26 PM

Identify the event severity level in Windows logs for the events that are not necessarily significant, but may indicate a possible future problem.

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium 312-39 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
NO
Norah 11 months ago
I always thought these were just minor issues.
CA
Carylon 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not an Error?
YU
Yuki 12 months ago
Agreed, Warning makes sense here.
AR
Arlene 12 months ago
I thought it was just Information level.
MO
Monte 1 year ago
It's definitely a Warning level.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think "Error" is definitely too serious for this context. "Warning" sounds right to me.
GE
Georgiann 1 year ago
I feel like "Failure Audit" could be too severe for what the question is asking. "Warning" seems more fitting.
AD
Adria 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember "Information" events are usually just logs and not really a sign of future problems.
NE
Nelida 1 year ago
I think the answer might be "Warning" since those events can indicate potential issues without being critical.
LE
Leslie 1 year ago
Link aggregation sounds like the way to go. That's the solution I'd recommend based on the information provided in the question. It's a straightforward way to combine the two NICs and boost the network performance.
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
Wait, what's the difference between products E and R? I need to make sure I understand the problem statement before I dive in.
CO
Colton 1 year ago
Wait, could it be negative reinforcement? I kind of get mixed up with the terms sometimes.
PH
Phung 1 year ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The table gives me the key details I need to identify the correct code snippet to use.
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key is to identify the correct statements about gcti DNs specifically.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
I bet the answer is E) 'Meh, it's fine, just ignore it.' Because that's how I handle most of my problems, and it seems to be working out great so far!
ZI
Zita 1 year ago
B) Warning, for sure. I mean, who wants to ignore a potential problem? That's like trying to fix a flat tire while it's still flat - not a good idea.
GR
Gracia 1 year ago
D) Information seems like the logical choice here. These events are not necessarily significant, so they'd probably fall under the 'informational' category. Easy peasy!
CR
Cristy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gracia
Yeah, D) Information is probably the most appropriate severity level for those types of events in Windows logs.
HE
Herschel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gracia
I agree, D) Information seems like the best option for events that are not necessarily significant but could be important later on.
AM
Amber 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gracia
I think D) Information is the right choice here. It makes sense for events that may indicate a possible future problem.
HE
Hester 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking C) Error, but now I'm second-guessing myself. This is a tricky one!
HE
Hester 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hester
I agree, I'll go with B) Warning as well.
AN
Antonette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hester
I think it might be B) Warning.
HA
Halina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hester
D) Information
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hester
C) Error
OC
Ocie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hester
B) Warning
RE
Renea 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hester
A) Failure Audit
EA
Earnestine 1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Warning. These events may not be critical, but they could be a sign of a potential issue down the line. Better safe than sorry, right?
SA
Santos 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
I always pay attention to warnings in the logs, they can save you from bigger problems later on.
IN
Ines 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
Yeah, warnings are like a heads up that something might go wrong in the future.
TO
Toi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
I think you're right, warnings are usually a good indicator of something that needs attention.
EL
Elbert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
I agree, it's always better to be cautious when it comes to potential issues.
RE
Ressie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
I always make sure to investigate warning events further, just in case.
JE
Jeanice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
Yeah, I always pay attention to warning events in the logs, just to be safe.
TY
Ty 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
I think you're right, warning events can definitely indicate a possible future problem.
PA
Pamella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Earnestine
I agree, it's always better to be cautious with those warning events.
SV
Svetlana 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Information because it provides details that could help prevent future issues.
CA
Carma 2 years ago
I agree with Elinore, Warning seems like the right choice for events that may indicate a possible future problem.
EL
Elinore 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Warning.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel