MENU
Which of the following can help you eliminate the burden of investigating false positives?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 312-39 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
CA
Carin
11 months ago
B is a must! Can't trust everything blindly.
KI
Kimi
11 months ago
Really? I doubt that just ingesting context data solves everything.
AL
Aleisha
11 months ago
Totally agree with D! Context data makes a huge difference.
SH
Shawn
12 months ago
Not sure about A, keeping default rules can be risky.
FR
Francesco
12 months ago
D is definitely the way to go! Context is key.
TE
Tegan
1 year ago
Keeping default rules doesn't sound like a good strategy to me. I feel like that would just keep the noise level high.
AL
Alonso
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think not trusting the security devices could be a valid approach, but it seems risky.
RH
Rhea
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like treating every alert as high level could lead to more confusion. That might not help at all.
AR
Arlie
1 year ago
I think I remember something about context data being really important for reducing false positives. Maybe option D is the right choice?
DE
Desire
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards D as well. Gathering more context around the alerts is crucial for being able to properly investigate and triage them. The other options don't really address the root issue of false positives.
BA
Barney
1 year ago
D seems like the best option to me. Ingesting the context data around the alerts can provide valuable information to differentiate between real threats and false positives. The other choices don't seem as effective.
MA
Malcom
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Ingesting the context data is key to reducing false positives and getting a better understanding of the alerts.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure if keeping default rules or treating every alert as high level would really help eliminate false positives. I'll have to think this through carefully.
ST
Stevie
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key point seems to be that the State Repository pattern allows you to "defer state from memory to a state repository" during those long periods of inactivity in complex compositions. So I think the passage is saying that's why it's a core part of the Enterprise Service Bus pattern. I'll go with True on this one.
DI
Dino
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to monitor the cluster, not individual VMs, since the question asks about monitoring all VMs in a specific host cluster.
BO
Bok
1 year ago
I think the answer is Stream. That's the Microsoft 365 service that allows you to upload and manage videos, and it has automatic transcription capabilities.
DE
Desmond
1 year ago
I'm not a fan of option C. Treating every alert as high level? That's like trying to put out a campfire with a fire hose. Talk about overkill. Give me some contextual data any day!
JA
Janine
1 year ago
I always prioritize context data over everything else. It's the most efficient way to handle alerts.
AS
Ashlyn
1 year ago
Context data is key. It helps you focus on what really matters and avoid wasting time on false positives.
VE
Veronique
1 year ago
I agree, option C does seem a bit excessive. Contextual data is definitely the way to go.
RO
Ronny
2 years ago
D all the way, baby! Ingesting that context data is the key to unlocking the secrets of the false positive realm. Plus, it's way more fun than, like, not trusting your security devices (B). Where's the challenge in that?
TE
Tess
1 year ago
D) Ingesting the context data
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
C) Treating every alert as high level
JU
Jules
1 year ago
B) Not trusting the security devices
JA
Jacquline
1 year ago
A) Keeping default rules
FE
Felicia
2 years ago
I don't know, man. Keeping the default rules (A) sounds like a recipe for disaster. You gotta customize that stuff, you know? But D is probably the safest bet.
EV
Eva
2 years ago
I believe treating every alert as high level is also important to avoid missing any potential threats.
TR
Trina
2 years ago
I was thinking C at first, but that seems a bit heavy-handed. Treating every alert as high level would just create more work for us. D is definitely the way to go.
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
Yeah, ingesting the context data will definitely help us streamline the investigation process.
DE
Devorah
1 year ago
I agree, D is the best option to eliminate false positives.
SA
Santos
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the answer is D. Ingesting the context data seems like the best way to reduce false positives. Anything that gives you more information to work with is a win in my book.
JO
Josphine
2 years ago
I agree with Josphinebie, ingesting context data provides more information to accurately assess alerts.
BO
Bobbie
2 years ago
I think ingesting the context data can help eliminate false positives.